“I was once in the tradition of social realism – but I am now avant-garde and misunderstood.”
Audrey Amiss was an English artist who formally trained until her bipolar disorder and paranoid schizophrenia led to decades of institutionalisation.
Typist Artist Pirate King dramatises her life following a recent discovery of her work. Her story makes for an interesting character study, framed as a simple road film.
Audrey’s artistic style reflects the severity of her illnesses, the realism of her Royal Academy days slowly fading into heavy-handed abstract and emotive strokes. She loses the skill and technique she once had, instead relying on innate intuition alone.
The artwork acts as intertextual snapshots of the events in her life, each one’s style portraying her state of mind at the time. As the film looks at a younger Audrey, the perspective of her art is much closer to reality than the works that diary her more recent life.
Read more: Glasgow Film Festival – A deep dive into the 2023 festival line-up
When a hitchhiking young artist tells Audrey he likes outsider art, she sneers at the invalidation. Being defined as an outsider artist is an inherently limiting way to describe something free from convention, after all. A question is asked whether this label is uplifting or an exercise in ‘othering’ from an exclusive and elitist art world.
Monica Dolan strikes a strong performance as Audrey, nailing the unbridled Yorkshire spirit that flows through her conversation. Her portrayal would sit neatly in a Mike Leigh film, exuding a conflicting strangeness and genuineness that makes her character dynamic and real.
Kelly Macdonald plays a social worker named Sandra who acts as the straight woman to Audrey’s more off-the-wall behaviour. She keeps her and the viewer firmly in reality, a responsive force to whatever unique process plays out in Audrey’s head.
It’s through Sandra’s role and reflections on being institutionalised that the state’s capacity to help those suffering with mental illness comes into question.
Audrey has grave mistrust of the state’s help, owing to the factory-like holding pens she was confined in for decades. As conditions change and social care becomes the primary assistance for mental illness sufferers, the continued cuts to funding for such services only result in the same lack of understanding. Sandra tries her best yet clearly doesn’t have the resources to deal with someone as intensive and complicated as Audrey.
While Audrey is an engaging and dynamic character, the film is rarely truly from her perspective. It stands in a reactive position rather than allowing itself to be fully immersed in her world. As a character study, it revels in observation, forgoing the less travelled path of embodying her internality more fully.
The moment we clearly cross into her viewpoint provides a visual metaphor for one of the film’s emotional arcs, yet it feels slightly out of place. Audrey’s character and personality is represented to such depth that it is almost a shame that the one unfiltered moment into her conscience doesn’t give particularly great insight beyond simple resolution.
Read more: Glasgow Film Festival – Girl paints heartful portrait of immigrant life
There is enough space to play around in the verisimilitude, proven by the film itself. When Audrey escapes Sandra and ends up riding in a man’s van, his sudden turn towards groping her is cartoonishly evil. Out of Sandra’s presence, we’re left to trust Audrey’s experience of events and wonder just how much of a reliable narrator she is. The van parks in a suspicious way, lending credence to her interpretation, yet there is intrigue in what actually happens when all that’s there to rely on is her heightened sense of reality.
Regardless, Typist Artist Pirate King is an incredibly likeable study of Audrey Amiss, the art she produced and its fractured progression, the failures of understanding mental illness and the system around it, and the process of a creator’s hands. She’s not an outsider artist, she’s just avant-garde and misunderstood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel