Fringe Theatre
Trying it On
Traverse Theatre
Neil Cooper
Four stars
There’s something happening here in David Edgar’s look back in something between anger and languor at his twenty-year old radical self, and how those who came of age in 1968 ended up voting for Brexit. What it is is pretty clear as Edgar himself rummages through his back pages in Christopher Haydon’s production for China Plate is how the times both have and haven’t changed.
While a long way from being a revisionist recanting of old ideals, Edgar isn’t shy of making himself and others of his generation look a tad silly in their puritanical earnestness. And if there’s any hint of him suggesting today’s new wave of activists respect their elders, it’s roundly countered as the play lurches away from being a sixties survivor’s stroll through counter cultures past into the here and now of things.
With all the liberal gains of the last half century currently under threat, Edgar has created a thoughtful and witty meditation on his generation that is part history lesson, part memoir and, crucially, part call to arms to learn the lessons of the past. At the end, it is also a joyful show of solidarity that suggests the revolutionary ideas that shaped Edgar aren’t done with yet.
Until the Flood
Traverse Theatre
Four stars
The shrine that lines the stage throughout Dael Orlandersmith’s new solo play - all teddy-bears, candles and tied-up messages of grief – is sadly telling image of our times. It illustrates too the depth of feeling stirred up by the shooting of black teenager Michael Brown by white police officer Darren Wilson in Missouri in 2014.
Through a series of monologues drawn from interviews with eight local residents caught in the fallout of the shooting, a portrait of America in all its contrary complexity is powerfully made flesh by Orlandersmith’s searing performance.
The result is a haunting meditation on community in all its messy and at times curmudgeonly ways. But it’s more than that. It’s about forcing that community, and the whole of America by default, to confront itself following the shooting of Brown, and to ask themselves and each other why it happened.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here