The Memory Police
Yoko Agawa
Translated by Stephen Snyder
Harvill Secker, £12.99
Under the staircase, the mother of The Memory Police’s unnamed female narrator once kept secret things – things, it transpires, that had disappeared.
“When she was taking a break from her work, she would show me the things and tell me stories about them. Strange stories like nothing I had ever read in my picture books,” the novelist-narrator, tells her editor, R, whose curse it is to remember the things that are to be forgotten.
The Memory Police by Yoko Ogawa, a much-decorated Japanese author born in 1962, is a dystopian allegory that sizzles with allusion. The eponymous Memory Police, who roam the town “in trenchcoat and boots” hunting down those, like R, who have failed to forget the disappeared things, evoke Iran’s morality police, combing the streets of Tehran for women whose manteaux are too tight, their headscarves too loose.
Indeed, part of the book’s power lies in there having been so many such oppressors in human history. Like shadow characters, the Gestapo, Stasi, KGB and every jackbooted secret police force that has ever existed step forward, as we read about the Memory Police’s dawn raids, Kafkaesque officialdom and abductions.
The hidden room where the narrator conceals R recalls Anne Frank’s hiding place; the disappearances of objects and knowledge echo the lunacy of China’s Cultural Revolution, when doctors and teachers were punished for their learning. There is, however, just one direct reference to historical events. As novels disappear, the narrator recalls Heinrich Heine’s warning that “men who start by burning books end by burning other men” but cannot remember who said it.
The Memory Police was first published in Japan in 1994 but appears here in English for the first time in a crisp, limpid translation by Stephen Snyder, who has translated other work by Ogawa. It’s an interesting moment to choose, and British readers not aligned with the direction of travel at Westminster may see in this book, which is set on an island in the grip of permanent winter no longer connected to the outside world by ferry, a disturbing parable.
“People – and I’m no exception – seem capable of forgetting almost anything,” the narrator tells us, “much as if our island were unable to float in anything but an expanse of totally empty sea.”
But The Memory Police, which contains a novel within a novel in which a writer who has been kidnapped by her typing teacher slowly loses her voice and then herself, is about much more than politics. It is both a metaphor for the ageing process, with possibilities and faculties slowly chipped away, and an examination of the self.
R tells the narrator that her soul will die if she doesn’t continue to write novels. Throughout the book, she struggles to write – to find her voice – and to claw back the disappeared things.
“I remembered. The pages of the book had opened and fluttered through the air just the way ‘birds’ had once spread their wings and flown off to distant places. But this memory, too, was soon erased by the flames, leaving behind nothing but burning night.”
Meanwhile, the writer in her novel, locked away in a clocktower surrounded by broken typewriters, is on the point of disintegration. Like Winston Smith in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, she has lost the power to resist, viewing her end and the erasure of her voice with sanguinity. “It must feel like a typewriter key falling back into place after rising for a moment to strike the page.”
The Memory Police is exquisitely crafted, and the beauty of the prose highlights the starkness of its vision. For if this book has a message, it is that the bitterest enemy is not the jackbooted Fascist but our own friable selves. Making a delivery to R’s wife, the narrator is spooked not by the police but her own imaginings.
“The snow was so perfect and untouched that it was almost frightening to disturb it, and I found myself unable to resist turning around to see whether my footsteps were following me as I made my way across the field of white.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here