Theatre
Alice in Wonderland
Tron, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
***
DOWN the narrow stairs, and into the dimly-lit basement where the bric-a-brac memories of childhood are lurking in the shadows. In Blue Raincoat’s current take on Lewis Carroll’s nonsensical classic, this is where Older Alice (Hilary Bowen-Walsh) comes in search of the Wonderland dreamscape she fell into on a hot summer’s day long ago. Look - there’s Younger Alice (Miriam Needham). coming centre-stage to act out the narrative voiced by her adult self... Not exactly curiouser and curiouser but on occasions confusing when - needs must with a cast of only six - Bowen-Walsh’s recall plays tricks and she morphs into the Dormouse and subsequently the Mock Turtle.
Like Older Alice, Ireland’s Blue Raincoat Theatre Company is looking back. In 1999, they staged a version of Alice in Wonderland adapted by Jocelyn Clarke: the bones of that script remain but director Niall Henry’s brooding revival has, in a way, looked grimly to Barrie’s Peter Pan and that pang of realisation - childhood has gone, Neverland/Wonderland are no longer within reach of your down-to-earth adult imagination. There is no deliciously eccentric magic, instead the hallucinatory blurring of logic has a sinister edge that stymies the whimsy. And why do both Alices have to pell-mell through their lines, rushing and shouting as if time was truly running out for them? Only the Mock Turtle’s slow aria in ironic praise of bea-yoo-ti-ful soo-oup allows the pace to draw breath, otherwise the cast - who shift characters valiantly in the switch of a bonnet or prop - are similarly driven to throw cadences, linguistic grace notes and vocal versatility into the wings. Vestiges of Carroll’s Wonderland do emerge in Paul McDonnell’s set designs that play brilliantly with differences in scale when Alice’s height acts up (and down!). Overall, however, there’s a gloom that short-changes the energies of childhood and kowtows to adult nostalgia for the way they were.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here