Opera
Macbeth
Perth Concert Hall
Keith Bruce
four stars
THE annual visit by English Touring Opera – where it now presses the rarely-used pit of Perth Concert Hall into service for its orchestra, having moved when Perth Theatre was closed for renovation – is always a highlight of the Perth Festival of the Arts, and if Verdi’s take on Shakespeare’s Scottish play did not prove the draw that other productions have been, that is not in any way a criticism of the clarity of James Dacre’s production, sung in Andrew Porter’s English translation.
There is no making Macbeth (Grant Doyle) and his Lady (his fellow Australian Tanya Hurst in the Perth performance) likeable, with her ambition for her husband outweighing his vacillation, but something a little more visceral in their relationship might have been good to accompany voices that were more than up to the considerable demands Verdi makes of his principals. Hurst was as characterful as she was powerful in her singing, but very self-contained in her stagecraft.
Designed quite simply by Frankie Bradshaw, with fine lighting by Rory Beaton, the set created individual points of focus for moments like the “Is this a dagger?” soliloquy. The most memorable images in this modern dress version, however were created by the witches, a chorus of nine who look as far from “secret, black and midnight hags” as you might imagine, in vibrant teal habits. In fact, although Verdi appears to focus on the central couple, some of the best music here is for the choral forces, who were on top form, with the banquet scene with Banquo’s ghost a particular highlight.
After a slightly hesitant opening few bars, the playing of the orchestra under conductor Gerry Cornelius was well-balanced with the singers, although the strings were occasionally swamped by the winds. Musically, Macbeth is a crucial work in the development of Verdi’s operas, and perhaps what this production most accurately reflects is that theatrically the composer was still developing his practice.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here