The Meg (12A)
Jon Turteltaub
Jaws is the film generally regarded as the first summer blockbuster. Back in 1975 people queued around the block to see Steven Spielberg’s adventure about a shark terrorising a New England summer resort. One of those was 15-year-old Steve Alten who, years later, was inspired to write his own shark story, The Meg.
And now the adaptation of Alten’s book is swimming towards the summer schedules. Unlike Jaws, it’s no classic; there is nothing enduring in the way it’s shot, or written, or acted; and unlike Jaws, its tale is too preposterous to keep people out of the water for real. But it is very, very entertaining. While most shark films focus on fear (47 Metres Down, The Shallows) and some on surreal laughs (Sharkanado), The Meg paddles somewhere in between and rather surprisingly gets away with it.
When a marine research team discovers a hidden layer of the world’s deepest ocean trench, they also encounter the 70-foot prehistoric shark that still lives down there, the Megalodon.
Most of the team survive the encounter, courtesy of deep sea rescue expert Jonas Taylor, played by action star Jason Statham. But the monster has followed them towards the surface and a whole new world of all-you-can-eat human buffet. “Man versus Meg isn’t a fight,” growls Statham sagely. “It’s a slaughter.”
So the scientists set out to find and kill the shark. And some things never change: they just need to get close enough to fire a poison dart.
The film takes a while to get going. There’s none of the suspense that usually leads to the discovery of a monster, and the initial CGI effects of the deep are murky and alienating. But once Statham has his first face-to-face, in the water encounter with the Meg, the adventure goes up several gears at once.
The script offers the usual band of stock characters, including the billionaire patron of the high-tech research centre who likes to hug but isn’t to be trusted, the motormouth coward, the ageing leader of the team and the assorted band of assistants who offer the viewer the customary challenge of guessing the order in which they’ll get munched.
The exception is Chinese star Li Bingbing, who plays Suyin, a marine biologist, single mother (of a very cute kid) and unlikely love interest for the beefcake star. Li adds some emotional depth to proceedings, and her character is an equal to Jonas in the decision-making and much of the action, particularly at the controls of the film’s fun, futuristic one-person submersible, the Glider.
Statham has been lightening his image lately, most notably sending himself up something rotten in the comedy Spy. And he continues in comic vein here, while also exercising his old skills as a championship diver. One thing about Statham is that when his character declares, deadpan, “I’m proceeding to the enormous killer shark”, you’d actually trust the actor himself to exercise the same bravado, and to make it back in one piece.
With the emphasis on humour-based thrills, there’s little of the terror and trepidation that came when Spielberg’s three men went fishing for the Great White 40-odd years ago. As the Meg approaches a Chinese beach resort, spectacle takes precedence over horror. The nods to Jaws – including the lad who persuades his mum to let him go for another swim – won’t lead to tragedy.
At the same time, director Jon Turteltaub has fun with things that Spielberg just couldn’t do in the Seventies. And with shark on squid, shark on shark, shark on nuclear submarine and shark on Yorkshire terrier, there’s something here for everyone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here