Festival Music
Viktoria Mullova & Katia Labeque
Queen’s Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce
four stars
IT IS not too fanciful, I think, to see violinist Viktoria Mullova’s Festival recital, in partnership with pianist Katia Labeque, in terms of her life journey. It is 35 years since her defection from the Soviet Union while on tour in Scandinavia, and the work with which she chose to open, Prokofiev’s fiery solo violin sonata, was written 35 years before that, to a commission from the state for a piece to stretch young players.
If that virtuosic opening was a statement about where she came from, Schumann’s sonata for piano and violin which followed, could be seen as an acknowledgement of her subsequent life at the heart of Western European music as the partner of conductor Claudio Abbado. Although the writing for the first-billed piano is exquisite, the violin always has the “top line”, and Mullova brought lightness of touch to the pretty second movement alongside the turmoil of the outer sections.
After the interval we were enveloped in her mastery of more modern music, for which this duo seems particularly well suited. Insisting that Takemitsu’s Distance de fee and Part’s Fratres were treated as a segue - without intervening applause - was perhaps unnecessary, given the violinist’s extended tuning breaks, but the works certainly pair well, the instrumental combination central to the success of the former and this arrangement of the Part a mesmerising version of a classic modern work - interestingly dating from only a few years before her departure from the Soviet Union and his from Estonia to Germany.
After which Ravel’s Violin Sonata In G might look like dessert, but is nothing of the sort. The most complex and intricate conversation between the two players, it seems like a soundtrack for the twentieth century ahead of its time. Few composers have ever made as effective use of pizzicato string playing as Ravel, but that is just one element in the range of colourful ingredients he deploys in a work that made the jazz musicians whose influence he had absorbed sit up and take notice.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here