Festival Dance
Cold Blood
King’s Theatre, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
five stars
Dance means footwork, yes? Not when it comes on-stage - and also on-screen - in Cold Blood. In this wonderfully whimsical, exquisitely crafted production, it’s the performers’ fingers that do the striding, the shimmying, the jetés and more, that choreographer Michèle Anne de May and film-maker Jaco Van Dormael have woven into vignettes about seven very untoward deaths. Does this sound grim? Grimm even? There are echoes, in Thomas Gunzig’s text, of the gruesome ends that befall the unwary, or the foolishly wilful, in many a fairytale. But there is also something poetically wistful about the images that flood the mind at death’s threshold - and it is this fleeting inner realm that Cold Blood’s ‘danses macabres’ bring so vividly, and often humorously, to life. And though each mise-en-scene is enacted in miniature, and then streamed simultaneously onto a huge cinema screen - you can see both in parallel action - the whole concept and execution is richly detailed on an impressively epic scale.
The nimble fingers of Gregory Grosjean, Gabriella Iacono and de May herself cut such persuasive capers that our eyes, and our imaginations, are beguiled into seeing recognisable humanity going about its daily business. A wrist strolls through a meticulously realised city-scape, gets behind the wheel of a car, slithers its fingers through a salacious pole-dancing routine. When the tiny set conjures Hollywood art deco fabulousness, the fingers don thimbles and it’s Fred and Ginger going into their tap-dance: pure genius-mischief,as is the sly take on Bejart’s iconic Boléro. Finally, David Bowie’s Space Oddity ushers in an achingly poignant witness to mankind’s space-age aspirations and our transient fragility. Breath-taking,affecting, magical. An unseen voice had initially ‘hypnotised’ us asleep. Its final “Three, two, one” supposedly wakens us back to life. Oh how you yearn to dream again, with the visionary Kiss and Cry Collective.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here