Performance
Five Telegrams
Festival Square, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce, five stars
OF the main innovations that director Fergus Linehan has brought to the Edinburgh International Festival – the vibrant yellow “Welcome!” branding on the streets, the strand of “contemporary music” programming, and the free public opening event – it is the latter that perhaps most clearly has seized the August initiative back from the Fringe.
Until this year, however, it is probably true to say that the substance of those occasions – what actually lay behind the music and the spectacle – was often opaque to many of the thousands who attended them. While in one sense the partnership that was created with the BBC Proms and 1914-18 NOW to make Five Telegrams diluted the sense of occasion this year, it also meant that the message of its content had a much better opportunity to be transmitted to those who had the chance to see it.
Composer Anna Meredith’s five-movement piece would, despite her protestations to the contrary, stand as an orchestral work with chorus, but equally it was clear how closely its conception was tied to the visuals created by Richard Slaney of 59 Productions. The fruit of their researches into communications during the First World War, from the gung-ho rhetoric of the media, to the censorship of postcards back from the front and then the pace of the message of the declaration of peace were themselves communicated with a clarity that surpassed the spectacles of previous years. In the horn figure of the third section and the solo cello that began the last one Meredith has written some of her most instantly appreciable music, and the way in which Slaney’s work was mapped on to the exterior of the Usher Hall visually surpassed the work he and his colleagues produced with Harmonium at the start of this series of events.
Although there would be few in the crowd in a position to make the judgement, it also qualitatively improved upon the incarnation of Five Telegrams at the Royal Albert Hall, both in terms of the vibrancy of the imagery and the projection of the sound mix. A triumph in every department.
Sponsored by Aberdeen Standard Investments
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here