ODDLY enough for a competition with the heft of something that ought to come around once every few years, the Wildlife Photographer of the Year is an annual event, this year’s winners barely out on the road before next year’s applicants have submitted their shots.
And what painstaking shots. Wildlife photography is about graft, patience, inspiration and a certain luck that is usually a result of the first three, but the results must betray nothing of the weeks, months, years, even, spent endlessly tracking the same group of animals or watching the same watering hole, the same garden view, the same patch of sky.
And the 100 images from 2017 are superb examples, writ large on back-lit panels in the National Museum’s main gallery space for the first time – and so also attracting, for the first time, an entry fee. Much life, under the water and beneath the skies, is here, from a science fiction-esque shot of three divers investigating the underwater footprint of a vast iceberg, to a sperm whale gathering and an octopus trying to grab its prey amongst an army of crabs.
The overall Wildlife Photographer of the Year is South African photojournalist Brent Stirton, for his visceral image of a slaughtered black rhino, shot by poachers, with its horn brutally hacked off. Compelling, damning and incredibly sad, the photograph was taken as part of an undercover investigation into the devastation of the rhino horn trade.
The Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year is Daniel Nelson of the Netherlands for his image of a young gorilla – also an endangered species – lounging in the forest of Odzala-Kokua National Park in the Republic of Congo, munching on a snack of breadfruit.
Wildlife Photographer of the Year, National Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, 0300 123 6789, www.nms ac.uk Until 29 April, daily 10am – 5pm, £8/£6/children free
Sarah Urwin Jones
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here