Music
The War On Drugs
The Barrowlands, Glasgow
Mark McLaughlin
three stars
When Adam Granduciel last visited Scotland he asked for some advice on the lingo, and got a lesson in local tribalism instead.
“Is it Edin-burra or Edin-borrow,” he asked at The War On Drugs’s underwhelming Usher Hall gig in 2015.
“It’s Embra,” came the response from the audience. “But Glesga’s better.”
Granduciel put this to the test in the band’s two night stint at the Barrowlands, and found a much warmer welcome. While Embra fans shuffled along politely, Glesga fans greeted his middle-of-the-road guitar rock with their signature gusto.
The Usher Hall was marred by poor sound, a common complaint in the capital’s cavernous concert hall, but the band had no excuses with the Barras’ tip-top ballroom acoustics.
However, the trouble with TWOD live is there is too much going on at the same level. Dual guitars melt into a wash of keyboards and brass, while Granduciel mumbles inaudibly amongst it all which is a shame as he has a fine voice.
At their best, TWOD sound like Division Bell era Floyd, with virtuoso guitar and euphoric soundscapes, and the “whoop” that announces the solo in Red Eyes is worth the ticket price alone, as the crowd gamely demonstrated by chanting along to one of Granduciel’s most distinctive licks — “nanana-nananaaaa”.
But too many of their tracks drift along or end abruptly as if the guitar shredding censor has pulled the plug. Most of the Barras crowd didn’t seem to notice, or care, cheering on Jon Natchez extended two-note baritone sax solo in Under The Pressure with their trademark: “Here we f***in’ go.”
For The War On Drugs, Glesga is definitely better — but only just.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here