Music: Scottish Chamber Orchestra
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce, five stars
THE MYSTERY of this week’s performances by the SCO Chorus of Schumann’s Requiem is why the work has been so comprehensively lost. My own theory is that it was in some way superseded by Brahms’s German Requiem, which turns out to owe it a huge debt in terms of the textures, cadences and structure of the choral writing, but which broke new ground in its language and humanitarianism – a result that would surely have dismayed Johannes.
Schumann’s Requiem is radical enough in its own way, the composer having looked at the text of the Latin mass with fresh eyes and produced a unique work. While parts can be seen as deeply personal from a man whose struggle with depression is well documented, sections like Domine Jesu Christe and the Sanctus are as powerful expressions of faith as can be found anywhere in the genre.
What is unarguable is that in conductor Richard Egarr and chorusmaster Gregory Batsleer the Requiem found the champions it deserves, with the size of the choir and the quality of the performance perfect for the piece. Save for a short Marian hymn for the mezzo (Daniela Lehner, one of a quality quartet), the chorus has the best of the music and sang it quite wonderfully, making the most powerful case for a lost masterwork.
Egarr – who has become the SCO’s key regular guest conductor – had paired it thoughtfully with the Serenade No.2 that the young Brahms dedicated to Schumann’s widow, Clara. Anyone who knew this early work would have been unsurprised that it was virtuoso clarinettist that later persuaded Brahms out of retirement. A score that dispenses with violins entirely gives all the melodic exposure to flutes, oboes and clarinets, the ten-piece wind band (with the addition of a piccolo for the finale) matched precisely by strength of the accompanying strings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here