Rating: 4/5
A MERE dozen or so years separate the Variations on Haydn’s St Anthony Choral by Johannes Brahms and Richard Strauss’s “symphonic fantasy” Aus Italien, but the younger man’s quartet of postcards from his holiday tour of Italy in 1886 sounds from another era entirely. That is partly because Brahms was working with older source material of course, but more because Strauss’s orchestration sounds in places about 30 years ahead of its time. That is particularly true of the second movement, In the Ruins of Rome, surely made to measure for a BBC4 history programme if it has not been put to that use al-ready. Despite incorporating one of the Italian tunes everyone knows – Funiculi, funicula – in the Nea-politan finale, From Italy as a whole remains curiously unknown, but German conductor Christoph Ko-nig’s account of it with the SSO is well worth catching when the concert is broadcast on Friday (October 20).
The Brahms, which opened Thursday night’s concert, is much more of a staple, as, of course, is the First Violin Concerto of Max Bruch. Their coupling in the first half of the evening displayed some struc-tural similarities, starting with the wind band opening of each. Many Herald readers will know the Bruch best from Nicola Benedetti’s playing of it, but soloist Kristof Barati’s account could scarcely have been more different. Although now ten years older than the composer was when he wrote it, curious-ly the Hungarian musician is not especially familiar with his countryman’s best known work and played from a score here, but that was no impediment to a fluid but meticulously precise account of the work. There may be more vivacity in Benedetti’s approach to the gypsy dance finale – one of the best tunes in the entire violin concerto repertoire – but there was a highly refreshing rigour about the technical mastery that Barati brought to such very familiar music.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here