Blade Runner 2049 (15)
Denis Villeneuve
TO attempt a sequel of such an iconic, influential film as Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner is a risky undertaking; waiting 35 years only ups the stakes. Yet this bold movie is so strange, thoughtful, moving and stunningly beautiful that it defies hype or cynicism. This is stand-out science fiction and cinema at its most ravishingly seductive.
Director Denis Villeneuve has made some of the best films of recent years, including last year’s alien science fiction Arrival; so Blade Runner was always in safe hands. At the same time, while drawing upon the themes and cyberpunk aesthetic of the original – and orchestrating the return of legendary star Harrison Ford – he’s crafted a highly distinctive work of his own.
In story terms, 30 years have passed since Ford’s Rick Deckard was finding life heavy-going as a blade runner, an LA cop charged with hunting down highly sophisticated slave androids – replicants – who had gone rogue. Deckard ended that film fleeing the city with one such replicant, Rachel, with whom he’d fallen in love.
Scott’s dystopia has only got worse: pollution is even more toxic, climate change has caused a global famine that was barely survived, many still flee to a better life "off world". Replicants are no less persecuted; while the newest models are now designed to be totally compliant, blade runners continue to hunt and "retire" the older ones still in hiding.
The film is full of delicious twists. Suffice to say that the corporate branding of replicants as “more human than human” is extrapolated in such a way as to threaten this fictional society’s precarious stability and give some protagonists a profound existential crisis.
Ryan Gosling is the blade runner K, a dour loner who only relates to his virtual reality girlfriend (Ana de Armas), who dazzles with her costume changes but, with the exception of one memorable scene, can’t exactly deliver tangible companionship.
When dispatching a replicant in the scorched countryside, K makes a discovery that throws everyone into a spin, notably his hard-boiled boss Lieutenant Joshi (Robin Wright) and the replicant inventor Wallace (Jared Leto), a mad genius with a god complex. Joshi orders K to investigate; Wallace sends his most lethal replicant, Luv (Sylvia Hoeks), to follow. All paths lead to the man who has been missing for 30 years: Deckard.
With a hefty running time and a pace that has more in common with rigorous art house than mainstream blockbusters, Blade Runner 2049 may not be to everyone’s taste. But succumb to it, particularly on a big screen, and it plays like a slow-burn dream that is utterly mesmerising.
Cinematographer Roger Deakins and the production team build on the original’s template – the futuristic pyramids and giant advertising holograms, the East meets West cultural melting pot – to create one wondrous image or sequence after another. One moment Deakins seems to have found a painterly way of shooting different gradations of grey; in another, K walks into a radioactive landscape soaked in orange; flying cars glide past buildings in a way that makes one’s jaw drop.
Yet the visuals never obscure character or the film’s pathos. A scene involving the memory-maker, a woman who creates the memories that lend replicants an inkling of humanity, is heartbreaking. Those involving the ironically named Luv, a kick-boxing villainess who has her nails done while orchestrating a drone strike, are fabulously good fun. And the confrontation between the determinedly low-key Gosling and the typically irascible Ford, each oozing charisma, completely fulfils its potential.
“Is it real?” K asks when Deckard gives his dog a drop of whisky. “I don’t know. Ask him.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here