Festival Music
Filarmonica della Scala
Usher Hall
Hazel Rowland
four stars
AN odd selection of pieces constituted the first of Filarmonica della Scala’s Festival concerts. Enescu’s two Romanian Rhapsodies may be his most well-known works, but they performed the less popular and more introspective second one. Moreover, Bartók’s Viola Concerto was left unfinished at the composer’s death and we can only hear it now in its reconstructed form.
This did not prevent Riccardo Chailly and the Filarmonica della Scala from approaching them with any less enthusiasm. The unison strings that began Enescu’s Second Romanian Rhapsody immediately announced the their powerfully rich sound, while Chailly’s stately pace meant he could draw out all the romanticism from the opening melodies. Full orchestral passages were played with intensity, sounding dramatically operatic.
Julian Rachlin’s striking entrance for Bartók’s Viola Concerto revealed his big, lush sound. In the first movement, the audience were treated to the many sides to his playing, from instances of tender lyricism to rough and furious playing. Rachlin undertook tricky fast passages with ease, whilst also highlighting their quirky, folky nature. A particularly magical moment occurred in the slow second movement, where Rachlin’s quiet melody was masterfully accompanied by the Filharmonica’s astonishingly soft strings.
Shostakovich’s Twelfth Symphony is also a cumbersome choice. It is considered the least profound of his symphonies and can seem like an unapologetic piece of Soviet propaganda. Chailly and the Filarmonica nevertheless treated the work seriously and relished its overt drama. Optimistic passages were never treated as straightforwardly uplifting, since Chailly kept an underlying sense of menace. The work’s final climax is a prolonged one, yet the awesome forces of the Filarmonica playing proudly at full volume ensured its momentum was never lost.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here