Festival Music
Chiaroscuro Quartet
Queens Hall
Hazel Rowland
four stars
WITH a first half consisting of two pre-Romantic composers, one might have expected that the expressive range of the Chiaroscuro Quartet would be limited. J.S. Bach’s instrumental music can seem drily academic, while Haydn may prioritise refinement over subjective feelings. But such emotional emptiness was entirely missing in the Chiaroscuro’s performance, which never fell short of riveting.
Playing excerpts from Bach’s The Art of Fugue, second violinist Pablo Hernán Benedí poignantly introduced the main subject. Although the ensemble played at a sedate pace, they maintained an underlying tension. It was fascinating watching these four instrumentalists works together for Bach’s fugal writing, as we could hear each of their individual roles in building the texture while simultaneously coming together as a single whole.
After the intensity of Bach, Haydn’s String Quartet in E-flat, Op. 76 No. 6 came as a playful contrast. The Chiaroscuros relished the first movement’s teasing pauses and dynamic contrasts, as well as the mixture of frantic playing and jollity in the third movement. But the real highlight was reserved for the slow second movement, where the simplicity of its stately melody allowed the quartet to show-off their sweet and serene string sound.
If the first half already demonstrated the Chiaroscuro Quartet’s expressive capabilities, then this was taken significantly further in Schubert’s ‘Death and the Maiden’ String Quartet. The pauses between the opening’s passionately severe chords were painful holes of silence that seemed to last far longer than they did in reality. Other than cellist Claire Thirion, the ensemble had been standing for the whole concert, which in Schubert’s highly dramatic work allowed first violinist Alina Ibragimova in particular to play with ruthless freedom.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here