Festival Music
Richard Egarr
St. Cecilia’s Hall
Hazel Rowland
three stars
RICHARD Egarr must be one the best advocates for early music. For while his recital of 16th-century English keyboard music may not sound all that approachable, his affable manner and enthusiasm did much to disprove such expectations. Egarr did not assume that his audience would be well-versed in the music of William Byrd, John Blow and Henry Purcell. He also eagerly explained the ins and outs of the three rather special, centuries-old harpsichords from the St Cecilia’s Hall and Museum’s collection assembled on stage, and took obvious delight in the prospect of playing them.
Keeping listeners engaged for the entire recital would nevertheless remain a challenge. Byrd’s Fantasia in A minor, which opened the concert, was initially interesting for its intricate passagework and scrunchy tuning. But this unstructured piece became monotonous, admittedly partly owing to modern audience’s penchant for the dramatic contrasts and dynamic range available to modern instruments. Yet as the concert progressed, and listeners became more attuned to these instruments, subtle contrasts sounded more prominently. In Blow’s Chaconne in Fa-Ut, for example, the appearance of thick chords, as opposed to lighter passagework, was striking. But Egarr’s decision to play the recital’s three final pieces by Purcell without a break did not work to his advantage. The result was that they sounded rather samey, with the three pieces merging inside the listener’s head.
Egarr had greater success in speaking to 21st-century ears in other works. Byrd’s "The Bells" was exceptional proof that not all early keyboard music consists of abstract fugues. Centuries before 19th-century programme music, Byrd had already demonstrated that the harpsichord can depict something more tangible – in this case, the peeling of bells on a pleasant Sunday morning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here