Festival Music
Seong-Jin Cho
Queen’s Hall
Martin Kershaw
three stars
STILL just 23, Seong-Jin Cho already has the enviable resume of a performer twice his age, and a highly successful one at that. A roster of competition successes, appearances with most of the major orchestras, an exclusive contract with Deutsche Grammophon – it’s a stunning list of achievements. So why did his performance here leave me unconvinced?
I confess to an aversion to performers taking (to my ear at least) excessive liberties with phrasing and timing. It’s a particular issue with Romantic repertoire, but can occur across the classical spectrum, especially when the work in question is well-known. I have a problem with it because I feel it ultimately does the music a disservice – mangling and distorting it away from its origin. Seong-Jin Cho does it all the time. Granted, the Chopin Ballades undeniably benefit from some affectation, but it was simply too much – hands were out of sync when they shouldn’t have been, inexplicable accelerandos and ritardandos destroyed the pulse, crucial landings got lost in the shuffle. Worse, he subjected the two Beethoven Sonatas in the first half to a similarly cavalier treatment. Too mannered, too affected and ultimately undermining the music’s integrity. The Adagio in the "Pathetique" all but fell apart, and elsewhere faster passages lost direction amid slippery time-keeping.
Let me conclude with some positives. This is a pianist with a remarkable technique, rendering impenetrable forests of notes with clarity and confidence, dispatching fiendishly difficult music with confidence and aplomb. He also clearly has genuine passion for the material – there is no disguising that kind of emotional involvement. But at the moment it’s style over substance – let’s put substance back in charge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here