Fringe Music
Keyboards at St. Cecilia’s
St Cecilia’s Hall
Hazel Rowland
four stars
WHO would have thought that tucked amongst the pubs and clubs of Cowgate lies the oldest purpose-build concert hall in Scotland? Having recently re-opened, and with an"official" Festival season underway, St Cecilia’s Hall began a series of Fringe concerts with not one but two harpsichordists in an intriguing if quirky recital of harpsichord duos.
Compared to modern instruments, harpsichords may be thought bland. Not only are they quieter, but their dynamic range is quite limited. In John Kitchen’s and David Gerrard’s steady hands, however, any presumptions were very quickly disproven. In Gaspard Le Roux’s Suite in A minor, the duo highlighted the array of characters their instruments can evoke, from the refined first movement, to the livelier, foot-tapping second, and a dancing finale.
With the first movement of Armand-Louis Couperin’s Deuxième Quatuor à Deux Clavecins, they enjoyed the contrast between moments of sweetness and dark subversion, while fast passages in thicker textures emphasised their instruments’ rich sound. In the slow movement, Gerard utilised his instrument’s capability of producing dynamic variation (an unusual ability for harpsichords). Although the actual changes in volume were slight, it forced the audience to really listen to hear the subtle changes.
Bach’s Orchestral Suite No. 3 seems particularly unsuitable for an arrangement for harpsichords. Violinists enjoy performing the melody’s long-held notes from its famous "Air", but such sustained notes are impossible for harpsichords to imitate. Yet surprisingly, the arrangement worked, partly because Kitchen and Gerard avoided dragging the tempo, but perhaps also because it was unnecessary for the audience to actually hear the famous melody for it to be present in their minds. The two Gavotte movements worked better still, since, unlike a full orchestra, the players could act spontaneously and insert their own personalities into their performance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here