The Forensic Records Society
Magnus Mills
Bloomsbury £18.99
Review by Keith Bruce
ALTHOUGH my sister was occasionally permitted to take a few 45s to parties in the 1970s, the Bruce record collection has survived more-or-less intact to greet the recent revival of interest in vinyl. A fit of generosity led me to pass on Black Sabbath Vol 4 to a younger cousin, and the regrettable sale of Robin Williamson's Myrrh album sometimes disturbs my sleep even yet, but on the plus side, through the acquisition of hand-me-down hi-fi separates, I now have the sort of set-up on which to play my discs that I could only dream of back in the day. Moving house is, of course, unthinkable.
All of which makes me, surely, the target demographic for the new topic for the deadpan humour of the much-admired Magnus Mills. The Forensic Record Society is not an account of modern criminal detection techniques catching up with the murderous fence-building protagonists in his award-winning and Booker short-listed breakthrough novel The Restraint of Beasts (as some might perhaps hope). Rather, it sees Mills applying his distinctive over-literal first-person narrative style to that corner of male geek-dom celebrated by Nick Hornby in High Fidelity. The narrator and his imperious pal James decide to take their love of a fine sonic platter (principally singles, but that in itself is a contentious issue in the story) beyond their homes and into a back room at their local pub, seeking out like-minded music fans with whom to compare notes. Except – this being a Mills world where expected behaviour is never quite fulfilled – the rules of The Forensic Records Society, as outlined on-the-hoof by James, expressly forbid comment on the choice of three records brought to the weekly gathering by other participants. Listening is silently forensic (our narrator helpfully describes the possible attitudes that can be adopted to indicate this as "serene, solemn, mesmerised and so forth") but subsequent analysis is forbidden.
Obviously that restriction invites competition, and the back room at the Half Moon quickly becomes the venue for a rival record club with a different agenda, on another day of the week.
In this male-only world, women are strange unfathomable creatures, at least through the eyes of our storyteller. But then he fails to see what is happening in front of his very eyes between his pal and the barmaid with the mysterious musical past. And of course, one of the especially normality-challenged characters here is called Keith, as they always are, just as Mike Leigh, Alan Ayckbourn and Martin Amis have decreed must always be the case.
I have tried not to allow that, or the easy prey we vinyl junkies certainly are, to colour my judgement, but it still seems to me that the author's comedy muscles are not working at full stretch here. There are some wonderful aspects to The Forensic Records Society – the naivety of the narrator is at least the equal of his predecessors in the Mills canon, and the device of naming only the titles and never the artists of all the records cited makes a pop quiz of the book's pages that even those whose obsessiveness is being ridiculed are bound to enjoy.
It is also possible to contend that Mills brings together the prosaic and precisely limited setting of this and other books and the more fantastical world of his 2011 novel A Cruel Bird Came to the Nest and Looked In in what is a pithy allegorical critique of how wider contemporary society works. It is not unusual to see Mills's writing described as Kafka-esque or Python-esque, but many readers miss the comedy in the former and Mills is rarely as laugh-out-loud as the latter – nor, indeed, as Flann O'Brien, who seems a more obvious influence. Here, however, his understated, precise, observational prose rarely raises more than a wry smile, although it still proves a brisk and entertaining read.
And Bloomsbury have pushed the boat out with the packaging, which is a wonderful pastiche of the sort of vintage 1960s 7-inch single sleeve collectors covet at record fairs, and will really make you think there must be three minutes of music as well as 180 pages of prose to discover inside. Here's a thing though: my first singles – still carefully alphabetically stored – cost me eight shillings and sixpence (42.5p in new money), which makes this pretty little book look a little expensive for the few hours it will distract you.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here