Aye Write Weekend:
John Byrne, Friday, Royal Concert Hall
Woody Woodmansey, Saturday, Royal Concert Hall
What’s Next for Scotland? Gerry Hassan, Alex Massie, Lesley Riddoch, Saturday, Royal Concert Hall
The Makars: Jim Carruth, Jackie Kay, Liz Lochhead, Saturday, Mitchell Library
I can’t remember the last time an audience displayed such a strong sense of affection for a speaker at Aye Write as it did for playwright and artist John Byrne. Best known to many perhaps for the BBC serial from the 1980s, Tutti Frutti, he was there to talk about the ‘books that had made him.’ It was perhaps surprising that poets featured more heavily than playwrights (Philip Larkin and George Barker, as versus Simon Gray), and diarist James Lees-Milne. Byrne confessed he hadn’t read a novel since 1957, didn’t watch films and still used typewriter. His audience adored it, as much as they adored The Slab Boys and Cutting a Rug, but as they wanted to know why they weren’t seeing more of his work on stage, I couldn’t help wonder if perhaps his seeming aversion to new technology and other modes of storytelling was part of the reason.
His reminiscences of times past were ever fascinating though, and chimed with drummer Woody Woodmansey, who, like Byrne, was working in a factory when art, and fame, claimed him. Byrne hailed from Paisley, Woodmansey from Hull, and both confounded the road that class had chosen for them. Woodmansey recalled the night he sat in his parents’ house, trying to decide between a factory promotion and working for then lesser-known David Bowie. ‘But music was all I wanted,’ he said. Bowie’s ability to communicate emotion, to connect, with his songwriting was what marked him out. ‘Do you believe in it or not?’ he asked. In those early days, it was worth sleeping on the stairs in a sleeping bag, eating bad food and earning only £7 a week.
From the past to the future, and what kind of Scotland we want to shape, was the question that came up again and again at an informed and civilised debate between those who want to save the United Kingdom and those who prefer independence. All three panellists agreed that a second independence referendum is on the cards thanks to the Brexit result – the only question is when. But that’s about as simple as the questions get. Not just whether to leave the UK, but whether to opt for the EU, or EEA status, should independence be selected, will be further questions to consider. ‘There’s more than one club in Europe and we need to decide which one to join,’ Lesley Riddoch pointing as she did in 2014 to the Scandinavian model. Alex Massie seemed sanguine, warning of ‘two more years of grinding constitutional warfare,’ while Gerry Hassan wondered if those who feel more disadvantaged would turn out to vote in greater numbers a second time around. The audience may have been partisan, applauding Riddoch’s expression that neither side should feel an ‘entitlement’ to say their side is right, for instance, but there was an almost subdued feel to both the panel and to those listening, a sense that only a careful weighing-up of options would do.
There was nothing ‘careful’, however, about Saturday evening’s session with the three Makars, and that’s because it was almost wholly joyous, even when Lochhead was speaking about ‘absent fathers’, and Carruth was mourning the loss of a rural way of life. Kay could barely contain herself about a recent visit to Uist and even her poem, written on the day Trump was elected which also happened to be her birthday, raised a smile. All three poets, widely experienced in entertaining an audience, gave first-class, or should that be, world-class readings of their work. It was a privilege, and a great pleasure, to be in their company.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article