Music
James Arthur, O2 Academy, Glasgow
Jonathan Geddes
Two stars
If the question ‘how bad is British pop music at this moment in time’ is asked, then James Arthur covering Clean Bandit’s irritating chart-topper Rockabye at this gig would provide a succinct answer. It was the bland singing the bland, yet Arthur on the whole was less easy to dismiss than that one ill-judged cover.
His pop resurrection, after X Factor, being dropped by his record label and a notorious row over homophobic language, has been unlikely, and when he mentioned that he came close to quitting music you suspect it was truthful. Yet the past year has brought a No 1 single and album, and the Academy was sold out, although the amount of chatter and noise that greeted some songs suggested that X Factor appeal, where the thrill is to see someone off TV rather than actually hear them, has not left. There seemed rather more craving for syrupy set-closer Say You Won’t Let Go or his dreary cover of Impossible than the blunt material detailing his mental health issues.
Tracks like Prisoner (enjoyably sturdy pop-rock) or Sober (a funk number on which Arthur played ladies man to the crowd) brought a sincerity that many talent show winners lack, something also true of a full throated I Am and the acoustic Safe Inside, songs that made good use of his roughhewn vocal.
However that voice was distinctive but not always successful. On the generic rock of Recovery or Phoenix’s watered down pop, it struck the gasping tone of a drama student attempting a death scene. Coupled with the unadventurous nature of the music it ensured a set flavoured with honesty but lacking in creative punch, albeit with flashes of legitimate talent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article