The Unaccompanied
Simon Armitage
Faber & Faber, £14.99
Review by Tristram Saunders
SIMON Armitage is back – although he’s hardly been away. The Unaccompanied is his first full collection of lyric poems in a decade, but he’s been busy in the meantime: turning out plays, prose poems and travel-memoirs; translating Latin and Middle English; writing verse for TV, for radio, even for boulders – his ‘Stanza Stones’ are half a dozen rocks dotted across Yorkshire.
Like those rocks, Armitage is an unshakeable presence on the bardic landscape. The Huddersfield writer is Britain’s most lauded popular poet since Larkin. Since becoming Oxford Professor of Poetry in 2015, the 53-year-old looks increasingly likely to succeed Carol Ann Duffy as poet laureate.
As Armitage grows older, his readers have got younger. For almost 20 years he has been a fixture on the AQA school syllabus in England, where to many students he is now better known than Burns. His place on the curriculum is partly due to his lucid, effortlessly readable style. One study-guide to his poems asks pupils: “What examples of simple language can you find?” The question does him a disservice. Armitage has an inimitable voice – punchy, conversational and bold in its use of slang and cliche.
But in The Unaccompanied that characteristic swagger has been toned down, and the depths beneath his “simple language” are more apparent than ever. It’s not simple but distilled, as clear and sharp as rainwater: “I bed down in a stone pen/ and curl up unborn.”
Of course, he can still pull out the stylistic stops to earn a laugh. A Homeric pastiche called Poundland is uproariously funny, stranding Odysseus in an underworld of bric-a-brac. Later, he mocks the writer’s lonely life in The Poet Hosts His Annual Office Christmas Party: “the art of pulling my own cracker/ is something I’ve mastered over the years”.
But the prevailing mood is darker. In I Kicked a Mushroom, that small act of pointless destruction leaves the poet racked with guilt: the broken mushroom, with "one root as thick as a wrist”, could almost be a severed artery. Still, at least no real blood has been shed. The wry, deadpan violence that cropped up in his early work is largely absent here. Armitage, a former probation officer, has written several memorable poems in the voices of bolshie con-artists and criminals. But the only felon we meet in this volume is a sad, silent figure: real-life murderer (and cannibal) Robert Maudsley, the “bland mousy man with the blank face”. In Solitary, he’s not only trapped in the “glass case” of his cell, but held motionless in the cold, echoing confines of a villanelle.
Elsewhere, Armitage turns his gaze to a melting snowman, a nurse shivering at a bus-stop, and – in the bleakly funny Gymnasium – “the loneliness of dumb weights… the silent companionless scream of the castaway’s mind/ in the bodybuilder’s head.” But these thumbnail sketches can feel over-familiar. Unable to walk, a lonely pensioner in Poor Old Soul is found starving in his home (“I ran out of biscuits”). His predicament is straight out of Alan Bennett’s 1988 play A Cream Cracker Under the Settee.
Despite the focus on isolated figures, the most powerful poems here are about the bonds between daughter and father, or father and son. In his Keats-Shelley Prize winner The Present, he tries to bring an icicle home to his daughter, only to find “there’s nothing to pass on, nothing to hold."
Armitage likes to joke that he’s annoyed his father isn’t dead yet – after all, he’s written so many brilliant elegies for him. The best is Harmonium, in which they carry the old instrument out of a church together. It “had stood facing the choristers’ stalls / where father then son had opened their throats/ and gilded finches – like high notes – had streamed out.” That poise of that flipped simile is Armitage firing on all cylinders. It sings. In the end, though, that song movingly gives way to pained silence:
“And him being him he has to say
that the next box I’ll shoulder through this nave
will bear the load of his own dead weight.
And me being me I mouth in reply
some shallow or sorry phrase or word
too starved of breath to make itself heard.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here