T2 Trainspotting (18)
four stars
Dir: Danny Boyle
With: Ewan McGregor, Robert Carlyle, Jonny Lee Miller
Runtime: 117 minutes
DANNY Boyle’s belter of a drama begins with a shot of people running. While fitting for a picture that made tearing down the street to Iggy Pop’s Lust for Life part of Scottish cultural history, it is also a sign of Boyle’s intention to not just wander down memory lane but to sprint, taking in all the old sights along the way.
His picture will pause here and there, like Renton over a car bonnet, to give the viewer a manic grin, or in one particular scene a dirty great laugh, but it will also halt you in its tracks with some unexpected poignancy. (Cue voice of Begbie in head: “Unexpected poignancy? Wit is this s****?”). Whatever it makes you feel, Boyle’s sequel to the 1996 film that lit a fire under notions of Scottish “cool” will not leave you unmoved. (Begbie again: “Gonnae ******* get oan wi this ******* review, doll?”).
It is 20 years on from the events which saw Mark/Renton (McGregor) doing the dirty on his pals after a drugs deal and fleeing abroad. Boyle and his screenwriter John Hodge, another old team reunited, quickly fill in what has been happening to our anti-heroes. Spud (Ewen Bremner) has been on and off drugs, Begbie (Robert Carlyle) is once more in touch with the forces of law and order, and Simon/Sick Boy (Jonny Lee Miller) is making a living through some, er, film-making of his own (the Irvine Welsh novel on which the 18-certificate film is very loosely based is Porno).
“You’re looking well, Mark,” says Spud on meeting his second best friend (his first, he reckons, being drugs). “Everyone says that,” says Renton. As well they might. Renton, Begbie and Miller look like they have spent the intervening decades enjoying successful careers stateside, so sleek are their physiques. Funny that. Only poor old Spud is looking as tatty as his real life counterpart would be by now.
A new face is Anjela Nedyalkova, who plays Veronika, Simon’s Bulgarian girlfriend. It is her lot to introduce, with occasionally sledgehammer-like obviousness, tales and riffs of times past. There are a lot of these, including an update to the “choose life” speech. Good times are remembered, and some awful ones too. Indeed, there are enough nods in T2 to T1 to bring on a sore neck. Nor is the story going to win any awards for originality. Some might be disappointed by this, believing Boyle and Hodge should have been bolder, less reliant on what went before. But the audience wants to feel the warm sand of nostalgia between its toes, and Boyle handles the references with such verve and wit that one can easily forgive their ubiquitousness.
Moreover, the point of the first film, and this one, is that most people don’t change much, their lives start small and end small, an idea Boyle gets across with frequent flashbacks to the four one-time pals as boys. In these lives there are no miraculous turnarounds, no “journeys”, no character arcs, no redemption. This is Leith, not La La land, after all.
There are original pleasures to be had, though, such as a soundtrack so achingly cool it will give your ears ice burns, and the pin-sharp cinematography, with frequent Boyle collaborator Anthony Dod Mantle (Slumdog Millionaire, 127 Hours) proving a fitting successor to Brian Tufano in making auld Reekie look brand new. While the comedy can be disappointingly broad at times, there is one scene, set in a club where the patrons are of, let us say, a certain Trumpian persuasion, that is sheer genius.
Just as the first picture took the pulse of Scotland, so this one is on the money, showing it to be a place of shiny new things (a parliament for one) and people, but one still tied to its past. At heart this is a film about ghosts – ghosts of dreams and good intentions, ghosts of the boys these men once were – yet you will be hard pushed this year to find a film that has such a lust for life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here