Music
St Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra
Usher Hall, Edinburgh
Martin Kershaw
three stars
STARK, plangent and ultimately defiant – Shostakovich’s Fifth Symphony is a truly a mighty thing, whose composer spent much of his career living on the verge of imprisonment under the Soviet regime, constantly walking a creative tightrope. An appropriate work to commemorate the centenary of the Russian Revolution therefore and the St Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra gave it a duly committed, resolute treatment. That famously bleak opening, the Allegretto waltz’s rictus grin, the heart-rending lament of the Largo, the triumph of the final movement – all were granted determined, sustained attention in a powerful performance. A deserved rapturous response followed for excellent work, only slightly undermined by the memory of a first half that had been a little underwhelmingby comparison.
Certainly the choice of repertoire was not to blame for this. The two excerpts from Khachaturian’s Spartacus are gloriously realised orchestral gems, particularly the Adagio, which features what is surely one of the most captivating melodies ever put to paper. And Prokoviev’s Third Piano Concerto is rightly considered a classic, a fascinating work whose dizzying difficultly is matched by a bewitching variety of tone and texture. In the Khachaturian, though, the ensemble struggled to achieve cohesion – entries and endings were ragged, intonation and balance were often elusive, direction disengaged and distant. The Prokofiev sometimes felt as if featured soloist John Lill (who gave a solidly assured, virtuosic rendition) was pulling the orchestra along behind him, chivvying them into life but never quite getting the response he deserved. So, yes, an admirable second half display, but one that couldn’t quite exonerate the flaws in what had preceded it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel