Festival Music
RSNO
Usher Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce
four stars
WITH luxury casting of the solo roles at the front of the stage, including Scots mezzo Karen Cargill as Mary Magdalene, conductor Edward Gardner also had an RSNO featuring 60 string players, the Edinburgh Festival Chorus, nine male singers from the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland and, in the Upper Circle, the angelic voices of the NYCoS National Girls Choir to realise Edward Elgar's vast cantata The Apostles. The composer also requires the hall's organ, a stage centre shofar horn, associated with the call to worship, and an early offstage visit by the oboes and cor anglais in a score that incorporates everything from huge brass swells to a plaintive solo viola.
The cumulative effect of all of this is some of the most moving music the composer wrote. The final (seventh) section, The Ascension, and its depiction of Heaven itself, is truly glorious and unlikely to be heard more beautifully performed than here, in what was a real Festival occasion. But if there could be no complaints about the singing and playing, it was also not difficult to understand why the work is not often done. If Elgar's treatment of the story of the New Testament is not strictly heretical, it is idiosyncratic, and his libretto has none of the skill and scholarship that Charles Jennens brought to Handel's Messiah, for example, as passages of Biblical text, like the Beatitudes, are interwoven with the expanded role for Mary Magdalene and an opportunity for Judas (John Relyea) to repent and return his bribe.
So although this event was musical sumptuous and theatrical in its huge forces, it is as drama that The Apostles fails – and that is no-one's fault by Elgar's.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here