“He also had his priorities straight: art, women, night life, gin, and music, not necessarily in that order.” – Cartoonist Danny Shanahan on Peter Arno.
As someone who struggles to be able to draw even a stickman figure there are no cartoonists whose abilities I don’t envy. But it’s possible there is only one cartoonist whose life I’d actively covet.
That’s no surprise. Most cartoonists are chained to their drawing board working for scant reward. Peter Arno was different though. The archetypal New Yorker cartoonist, his life was as glamorous and gilded as the debs and playboys who were to be his comic victims. And he was more famous than most of them.
Arno (1904-1968) dated film stars, mounted Broadway shows, was courted by Hollywood, became the subject of profiles in Time and Life magazines, even got a mention in F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Crack-Up. He was photographed by a young Stanley Kubrick, liked to work no more than two days a week, was named the best dressed man in America by the Custom Tailors Guild of America in 1941, and even got to design his own car once.
And he was one of the most popular New Yorker cartoonists in the history of the magazine. He sold his first cartoon to the magazine in 1925 and was a regular (or as regular as his sometimes lackadaisical working habits would allow) until his death. And as Michael Maslin, himself a New Yorker cartoonist, points out in his new biography of Arno, it was the cartoonist’s appearance in the magazine’s stuttering early days that helped transform its fortunes.
The New Yorker’s editor Harold Ross called Arno “the greatest artist in the world,” which may have been overstating it a little. But there’s no denying the boldness of Arno’s line, the comic rightness of his caricatures. Arno’s world was one of dames and dowagers, playboys and henpecked husbands, captains of industry and chorus girls. He took aim at New York café society while fully playing a part in its daily round. “The Roaring Twenties was a catch phrase: Arno’s work was the roar itself,” Maslin writes.
And Arno’s cartoons were funny. That’s the key. Although the concepts for his cartoons were often provided by others, it was the power of his cartooning– all strong black strokes held together by a grey wash – that sold the punch line. His comic world was powered by the promise of alcohol and sex. He “made lechery ludicrous,” as Life magazine suggested in 1940.
“I would see fatuous, ridiculous people in public places, in night clubs where I ran a band,” he once told Joseph Mitchell, “on trains and beaches, in cafes, at parties, and I was awfully annoyed by them, by the things they did and said. I had a really hot impulse to go and exaggerate their ridiculous aspects. That anger, if you like, gave my stuff punch and made it live.”
Of course he was as guilty of many of the same sins he assigned to others. It should be noted that he was at the same clubs and parties and cafes of course. And as Maslin reveals there were fights over women, there were two failed marriages, there was an old school sexism to his work that began to look rather dated by the 1950s when Playboy and Mad Magazine were engaging with rock and roll and the post-war world.
But then time catches up with everyone eventually. What we’re left with is a cartoonist who offered a raucous comic vision of his era, or at least its more socially elevated addresses.
Oh and trivia fans should note his cartoon of a plane crashing into the ground. As it bursts into flames a rather too sanguine engineer walks away saying, “Well, back to the old drawing board.”
Yes, that is indeed where the phrase comes from.
Peter Arno: The Mad, Mad World of The New Yorker’s Greatest Cartoonist, by Michael Maslin is published by Regan Arts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article