Thus Bad Begins
Javier Marias
Hamish Hamilton, £18.99
Review by Rosemary Goring
This is not the first of Marias’s novels with a less than arresting
title. I do not know how it reads in Spanish, but in Margaret Jull
Costa’s otherwise invisible translation, it does little to entice a
reader unaware of the pleasure Marias’s work offers. Taken from
Hamlet, “Thus bad begins, and worse remains behind,” it is
nevertheless an almost perfect summation of the contents of this
typically labyrinthine, sensuous, languorous and satisfying book.
The confidence with which Marias, one of Europe’s most gifted
novelists, approaches his tale is striking. As this and previous of
his books suggest, he feels no need to capture an audience with a
meretricious or ingratiating opener. Instead, he begins in pensive
mood, this being the recollections of a man now in late middle age,
looking back on himself when, in his early twenties, he worked in
Madrid as a researcher and secretary for an art house film director.
Juan de Vere is captivated by Eduardo Muriel, whose black eye patch,
hauteur and artistic credentials are magnetic. So, also, is his
household, where he works, in which Muriel’s three daughters live with
their beautiful if blowsy mother, Beatriz.
It is commonplace to say that Marias’s fiction always revolves around
secrets, but no less true for that. The layers of deceit, subterfuge
and hidden histories from which this particularly closely-knit novel
is composed are perhaps the finest example yet of his fascination with
the often concealed, unknowable elements that distort or shape a life.
Initially, the premise of the novel is simple. Muriel has a lifelong
friend, a renowned doctor called Jorge Van Vechten, who was on the
Francoist side of the civil war, and about whom he has learned
something shocking. Not sure whether to
believe it, he sets Juan the task of befriending a man so conceited he
will not be suspicious when he is invited into far younger company, to
find out if there is any truth to the rumours. Set in the early 1980s, Thus Bad Begins lies in that uncomfortable,
self-consciously blinkered period in which Spain tried to pretend it
had not been riven by a bitter civil war. For the moment, for fear of
opening Pandora’s Box, old enmities are smoothed over, and dangerous
allegiances disowned as if they had never existed.
As often before, Marias shows himself almost creepily at home in the
morally dubious terrain between the observer and the watched. For
Juan, snooping comes easily, although at some cost to his conscience.
“I realised how uncomfortable it is being a spy...There is something
base, something grubby about passing yourself off as someone else,
about behaving in an underhand manner, gaining the confidence of
someone in order to betray him, even if that person is a villain, an
enemy, a murderer.”
Marias is too subtle and original for this plot to become just another
fashionable unearthing of misdeeds from this grim bygone era. There is
an element of that as Van Vechten’s past is brought into the light,
but what brings the novel fully alive is not the
search for the doctor’s nefarious acts but for the origins of the
chilling rift that exists between Muriel and his wife.
In a scene that is strikingly painterly and filmic, Marias describes
the evening when, staying overnight, Juan sees on Beatriz knocking at
her husband’s bedroom door, begging to be let in, just for a hug. In
the weeks preceding this, he had been shocked by how unkind Muriel is
to his wife, calling her “a fat cow” and far worse. This night he is
witness to an astonishing exchange, one that has clearly been repeated
on countless previous occasions. Seductively dressed, Beatriz almost abases
herself in her need for affection, while Muriel is by turns weary,
kind, cold and harsh. In the course of this unhappy encounter it is
revealed that Beatriz had many years earlier told Muriel a secret she
would have been wiser keeping to herself, from which the poison
between them flows. Thereafter, Juan is as keen to find out what that
secret is as to unmask Van Vechten.
A contradictory, fascinating individual, Beatrix makes no secret of
her misery:
“When she was at her lowest ebb... she would take refuge in her part
of the apartment and could be heard playing the piano badly,
practising so very lazily or reluctantly that what we mainly heard was
the metronome, which ticked away for long period without a single note
or chord being played, as if it were a perpetual threat or a
representation of the tempo of her thoughts or the insistent beat of
her sufferings, perhaps it was a way of telling Muriel that her life
was passing by without his company and without her regaining his
affection, of making him notice her absence second by second, or at
the very least, I would think, forty times a minute.”
Marias’s style always has been and if possible is becoming even more
digressive and interior, though never less than
seamlessly elegant. Everything we learn is reached by tantalisingly
indirect degrees, through a process of observation and interpretation
that, for those keener on events than style or mood, might be
infuriating. Occasionally it is almost parodic in its orotund
technique, and at times sententious, the author taking his own
pronouncements a little too seriously. But the depth of insight into
his characters, and their motives, redeems these venal slips. As much
about the most powerful, primitive urges of passion, lust and physical
love as about the intellect, morality or politics, Thus Bad Begins
ought to be smoulderingly erotic as Marias describes couplings and
fantasies in some detail. In his hands, however, it is the opposite of
arousing, the sex it depicts soaked in sorrow, regret, power and shame.
In this winningly complete, rich and mature novel, the artistic
control Marias exerts never falters, and is rarely intrusive, with the
result that the growing complexity and repercussions of his story
become almost otherworldly in their mesmerising effect. Moving from
the domestic to the political, from the individual to the collective,
Thus Bad Begins is as brilliantly well conceived and emotionally
profound as one has come to expect from this master.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here