Music
Richard Goode
Glasgow Royal Concert Hall
Catherine Robb
three stars
There is an air of reassurance about the way that Richard Goode commands himself at the piano. His years of experience have perhaps diminished the novelty that comes with performing the repertoire that he is most respected for. And so there was no fanfare or ceremony, no fuss or over-excitement, as he sat down to begin his renditions of Mozart and Brahms. Without the need to take risks, what Goode did offer us was confident, solid playing that safely didn’t ask too many questions of its listeners.
This matter-of-fact approach was most effective for Brahms’s Klavierstucke (Op. 118 and Op. 119); with their grandiose sweeping gestures and strong lines, anything less than an obvious, self-assured touch would have weakened the masculine power that is stereotypically associated with Brahms’s romanticism. Even the dreamiest of passages were fearlessly sanguine. But perhaps there is something more to the Klavierstucke than this – something less brazen and instead more vulnerable that could be explored by appealing to a sense of humility. And although the clarity and playfulness of Mozart’s F major Sonata also came through with Goode’s poised and unhesitant interpretation, it was the A minor Sonata that could have done with more subtlety, to effectively capture the delicate frustration and sadness that underlies what outwardly appears so flippantly precise.
Strangely, though, there was one aspect of Goode’s performance that did take me by surprise. It seems as if whilst he was playing, he accompanied every line and phrase on the piano with loud, vocal humming. As bad performance habits go, this is surely one of the worst, as it not only distracted from the music, but at times often drowned it out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here