A television documentary will explore how feats of intelligence and espionage during Tudor and Stuart times shaped Britain's culture, religion and architecture.
Tracy Borman, chief curator for Historic Royal Palaces, said some of the landscapes that have come to characterise the country would have looked much different were it not for the James Bonds of yesteryear changing the course of history.
The author and historian said an opulent palace fit for James I's daughter Elizabeth might have taken the place of the Palace of Westminster if Guy Fawkes's gunpowder plot had succeeded.
Catholic monasteries would have become widespread in London if Henry VIII - backed by right-hand man Thomas Cromwell and his network of aides - had not revolutionised religion in this country.
And if England had become a satellite of Spain or France after being defeated by the Spanish Armada or Napoleon, there would have been significantly less investment in London all round as it would no longer be a capital, Dr Borman said.
The research and accompanying artist's impressions of the landscape were conducted to celebrate the launch of new series History's Ultimate Spies which airs on TV channel Yesterday on Friday.
Dr Borman said: "In the Tudor and Stuart periods, England was under tremendous pressure from the Catholicism of mainland Europe, and was a country in transition.
"These religious tensions birthed scores of assassination attempts from within and declarations of war from elsewhere, and the role of Britain's spies should not be underplayed when discussing how history eventually unravelled."
Adrian Wills, Yesterday manager, said: "Londoners are rightly proud of our city's most famous landmarks, but it is staggering just how different the capital's skyline might have looked had it not been for the work of the James Bonds and Ms of yesteryear."
:: History's Ultimate Spies will be shown on the Yesterday channel at 10pm on Friday October 16.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here