Strictly Come Dancing waltzed all over The X Factor in the ratings as the two talent show giants clashed for the first time on Sunday.
The BBC One ballroom series aired its results show, which saw former athlete Iwan Thomas become the first celebrity to be voted out of the series. It drew an average audience of 7.83m with a 33.2 per cent share of the total TV audience.
Over on ITV, an average of 7.49m (including those watching on ITV +1) were glued to X Factor's six chair challenge, which achieved a share of 32.4%.
The figure for fans who viewed just on ITV was 7.12m.
During the show, Simon Cowell, Cheryl Fernandez-Versini, Nick Grimshaw and Rita Ora were given the categories they will be mentoring this series (overs, groups, boys and girls respectively) and judge Ora selected her final six for the judges' houses stage of the competition.
Back in August, X Factor supremo Cowell had laughed off any talk of a ratings rivalry with Strictly, joking about the lack of a star-studded line-up.
He had claimed his show could easily beat Strictly: "I'd hate to say yes, because I know what will happen if I say yes, it will come back and haunt me.
"This show does feel better, the talent's great, they're interesting, so if it's us versus Peter Andre, I'm going to put my money on us."
Despite losing to Strictly once again in the ratings, Cowell can take heart from the general upward trend of X Factor's Sunday night ratings.
On August 30, the ITV singing show's first Sunday broadcast aired to an average of only 5.94m viewers (not including fans watching via timeshift on ITV +1).
The BBC will be very encouraged by the consistent performance of their celebrity dancing series.
Although it has dropped slightly from the 8.69m who tuned in for the glitzy launch, Strictly has so far maintained an audience above 7.6m viewers.
In an attempt to avoid the two series clashing, ITV published episode times for X Factor right up until the final in December.
However, the two shows are set to coincide over the coming weeks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here