The Young Beethoven, City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four stars
I FOUND the structure of Glasgow’s Beethoven series at the weekend, dividing the music between Young, Mature and Late periods in the composer’s life, a refreshing approach to presentation of the music, with one qualification, which I’ll come to in a moment.
Equally refreshing, however, was the evident maturation of the artists involved. I realised on Friday night that they have been growing into this too. I must have been reviewing pianist Llyr Williams for around a decade now. His performances of the Pathetique and opus 31 no 3 Sonatas were rich in depth and texture, way beyond his early days, when he recorded everything he played, then crucified himself in his search for the steel-y perfection with depth he has now attained, though I have no doubt he would disagree that he’s there yet.
And the Elias String Quartet, to judge from their playing of the two opus 18 Quartets, nos 1 and 5, which they delivered so effectively on Friday, has also matured. It seems to me that they have Beethoven’s endless surprises and abrupt turns more at their command and in their control. They are not taken off-guard or caught unawares by Beethoven’s frankly-volatile imagination. These were thoroughly-engaging performances from Williams and the Elias.
I’ll just touch on one issue, which is nothing to do with the players, and needs some space to tackle head-on. Presenters and commentators give far too much space, time and emphasis, in discussing “early” or “young” Beethoven, to the influences of Haydn and/or Mozart, unwittingly, perhaps, at the expense of awareness of Beethoven’s own staggeringly originality. This has to be addressed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here