DOCTOR Who star Peter Capaldi did not want a romance between his character and Jenna Coleman’s Clara, his assistant, in the new series.
“It would have been completely creepy,” the Glasgow-born star said.. “It’s fine if you have handsome young men like Matt (Smith) and David Tennant, but as a father I felt it would be inappropriate.”
As the 12th incarnation of the Time Lord, Capaldi is 57 and actress Coleman, who has played the Doctor’s assistant Clara Oswald since 2012, is 29. Having made a name for himself as The Thick Of It’s ,Malcolm Tucker, he says the lack of romance between the Doctor and his assistant has “forged a huge bond” between him and Coleman.
“There’s no romance,” he explains, “But there’s deep love.”
Coleman, also known for her role as Jasmine Thomas in Emmerdale, says starring alongside a new Doctor was exciting, but scary.
“The Doctor, who is my best friend, is not only in a different body, but he’s also getting to know himself,” she says. “Age made no difference. He’s an alien. We’re not lovey-dovey.
“Everything is more about what is unsaid, rather than said. Clara may seem like a control freak, but she’s trying to control the uncontrollable.”
The ninth series of the hit BBC One show starts again on Saturday, with Steven Moffat, from Paisley, at the helm once again.
A lot has been made of the relationship between the Doctor and his assistant, given that in the last series their relationship was really put through its paces.
The show is a phenomenon all over the world, with audiences in the USA and South Korea tuning in to watch it.
Capaldi reckons: “Unlike other sci-fi, Doctor Who has a domestic element – the Tardis could turn up in the Mall or a coffee shop – but it catches fire abroad, in culturally different places, particularly with students and young adults.
“I suppose it offers escapism.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here