Festival music
Zehetmair Quartet
Queen’s Hall
Kate Molleson
FOUR STARS
The Zehetmair Quartet often performs from memory — the players learn their parts by heart before they even start to rehearse, and tend to unleash thrilling levels of musical insight and expressive freedom accordingly. There were music stands on stage at this Queen’s Hall morning recital, but the capacity to react to each other and take the music in new directions was there from note one.
The quartet’s leader is the Austrian violinist and conductor Thomas Zehetmair, until last year music director of the Royal Northern Sinfonia and a superb all-round musician, simultaneously assertive and attentive, acutely detailed and instinctive. The Edinburgh-based Christian Elliott recently joined as the group’s cellist — you might recognise him as a regular player in the Scottish Chamber Orchestra. He makes a classy fit, just as alert and responsive as his bandmates if not yet quite as prominent a voice in the mix. For me the ensemble’s centrifugal force is violist Ruth Killius: my ear was constantly being drawn to her powerful sound and vibrant ideas.
The programme paired the wit and rigours of Haydn and Hindemith. The Serenade Quartet opened, a breezy work that was possibly composed by someone else but which has a mix of rustic pastiche and refinement that is classic Haydn. There’s no mistaking the composer of the Emperor Quartet, one of Haydn’s boldest and best; the Zehetmairs played both with agile spontaneity and an acute knack for colour calibration. Hindemith’s Fifth Quartet was robust, fiery and malleable with a silvery, haunting Adagio. As an encore we got the second movement of Hindemith’s Fourth Quartet, another adventure in light and shade and capricious spirit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here