Note to self. If I’m ever in need of a public advocate see if Tony Marx has some free time. Yesterday morning at the Edinburgh International Book Festival, the president of the New York Public Library gave a persuasive, passionate and positive defence of the role of libraries in our culture.
Marx’s vision was inclusive (the digital divide is still a thing, he pointed out) and utopian, embracing the library’s role as a connector in an online age, while continuing to recognise the importance of the physical book as a source of knowledge.
In doing so he even promoted the idea of librarians as heroic figures. Post 9/11 in the US it was librarians who were the first to stand up to the Patriot Act by destroying library borrowing records. Libraries, he argued, were “the last institutions in the United States of America that believe in privacy.”
Up to a point, Richard Sennett, writer and professor of sociology countered. Sennett wondered if libraries sometimes forget how important privacy is within the library itself. “We have made a fetish of access and transparency,” he argued. But didn’t creativity need a private space? He didn’t say “quiet please” but I think it was implied.
Museum curator Clementine Deliss offered another take in this sparky, engaged debate about libraries and museums and their futures. Who, she wondered, had the right to organise knowledge? Shouldn’t our classification systems be shaken-up now and again? You could feel the librarians in the audience wince at that.
In an age of library closures and declining footfall and politicians who, in Sennett’s words, invariably applied “shopkeeper logic” to all questions of funding, there was some good news. Marx pointed out that people still believed in libraries. There are 40m library visits per year in New York, he said. More than the number of people who visit the city’s museums or sporting institutions. “It’s not meant as a dig,” he said, eyes sparkling.
Public space also came up in Alexander McCall Smith’s latest love-in cum stand-up (or should that be sit-down) act at the book festival. In between discussing reincarnation, Foreign Accent Syndrome (it exists; look it up) and how dangerous hippos are, he was moved to comment on the controversial plans to build a new “walnut whip” of a hotel on the edge of Edinburgh’s new town. “It would look really good in Las Vegas,” he said.
“I don’t know why they don’t build a pyramid or an Eiffel Tower. We don’t have an Eiffel Tower in Edinburgh,” he added (you can imagine the level of wither going on in those words even if you weren’t there).
In a way Alison Case is declaring the book a public space with her new novel Nelly Dean. The title character is, of course, the servant girl in Wuthering Heights. And so this new story is one that is created in the gaps Case, an academic specialising in 19th-century British literature, found in Emily Bronte’s novel.
“I really believe in the imagination as a collaborative space,” she said when fellow writer Tracey Chevalier asked her about the audacity of taking on Bronte. “It’s not the solitary genius creating art out of nothing. The Brontes had a collaborative imagination.”
That said, she admitted, “I would not like to be waiting to read Emily Bronte’s review.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here