Photography: A Victorian Sensation
National Museum of Scotland
Until November 22
Reviewed by Alan Morrison
The first item we see on entry is an iPhone 3G from 2008. The last words we read before exit is a reminder that "more photographs are taken in two minutes today than were taken in the whole of the 19th century". In between these modern brackets is a magnificent exhibition that comprehensively charts the birth and early explosion of photography. It truly feels like one of those one-in-a-lifetime gatherings of private and public treasures.
It's immediately apparent that this is a museum, not gallery, show. There are framed pictures on the walls, of course, but far more objects in glass cabinets and yet these display items are aesthetically beautiful in themselves: the sturdy polished wood of the first cameras; photo albums that look like volumes lifted from the shelves of Hogwarts' Library; portrait faces and landscape scenes, arranged in rows, the plush velvet of their little pocket cases adding deep splashes of colour to the monochrome images.
All of this is extremely well supported by explanatory videos, on-screen slideshows and touchscreen displays that reveal tiny details of the miniature images. There's an educational drive behind everything, too, that sets out photography's roots in science by giving due credit to its pioneers (many from Scotland) and its social expansion from a prestigious luxury for the elite to the democratic medium it has become today.
Ultimately, though, it's the content of the images that takes the modern visitor's breath away. For me these included an 1840s salt print called The Old Game Keeper which sat beside the Fox Talbot home-made camera that created it; a 140-year-old stereoscopic image of the Museum's great hall, only a few steps but several lifetimes away from where I was standing; an actual photograph of Isabella Begg, the sister of Robert Burns. Hours could be spent here, being absorbed by the past.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article