Jonathan Geddes' verdict: three stars
Mark Knopfler certainly doesn't take the easy option. Even while playing an arena the size of the Hydro (albeit nowhere near capacity), he resolutely filled the set with the rootsier cuts from his career. This was admirable for stubbornness, yet not always satisfying as a performance.
The flaws could not be pinned on Knopfler's band, a terrific group of players, and the man himself is still a great guitarist. His voice, never the most nuanced of tools, was somewhat of a mumbled bark, though, and, as always, the stage presence prized steadiness over spectacular.
There were moments where the band interplay really took flight - the instrumental Father and Son, for instance, and a tremendous passage on the lengthy Marbletown that saw John McCusker's fiddle playing and Glenn Worf's bass build to a crescendo that swept the arena. However there was a disconnect on several others - the playing was fine, but it was like watching a clinic rather than actually experiencing a gig, or having anything to stir some passion.
Laughs and Jokes and Drinks and Smokes was a characterless traipse through Celtic melody, and Skydiver's flat attempt at summery harmonies struck upon the issue that Knopfler sometimes has, where proficiency isn't matched by excitement. A familiar set that picked some of the blander outings from his back catalogue didn't help, either, Postcards From Paraguay proving a particular slog through mildly rhythmic world-pop.
There were highlights, though. Romeo & Juliet was given a rousing treatment, while a sparky closing run saw the dewy-eyed romanticism of newbie Wherever I Go nestle comfortably alongside Telegraph Road's impressive guitar histrionics and a yearning So Far Away to fill the venue in a way the set didn't always manage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article