No Guts, No Heart, No Glory
No Guts, No Heart, No Glory
Sandy's Boxing Gym
Not a punch is thrown in anger in the Common Wealth company's follow-up to Our Glass House, one of the sleeper hits of last year's Fringe. However, in its real-life show-and-tell played out by a determined quintet of young female Muslim boxers, this new piece's depiction of young women empowering themselves enough to find a voice beyond their backgrounds is inspirational.
Taking place in Sandy's Gym, housed in a community centre in Craigmillar, director Evie Manning and writer Aisha Zia have choreographed a criss-crossing confessional that moves from a training session with punchbag and skipping ropes to climbing in the ring and declaiming like champions. On one level, the young womens' concerns - about themselves, their families and the world that would rather define them in other ways - are the stuff of any teenage rites of passage. In the context of their race, religion and what must have been a huge set of decisions to jump in the ring, No Guts, No Heart, No Glory transcends that to become an irresistible thing about muscle, guts and the determination to stand up for who you are in an increasingly mad world.
Until August 25
The Trial of Jane Fonda
Assembly Rooms
When movie starlet turned political activist Jane Fonda turned up in the Connecticut town of Waterbury in 1988 to film her new movie, Stanley and Iris, in a town with an especially high population of Vietnam war veterans, she was forced to face up to her past in a way she didn't expect. This is the backdrop for Terry Jastrow's new play, which imagines an off-limits event in which Fonda met the ex-soldiers boycotting her presence in town in a local church hall.
As a vehicle for another Hollywood icon, Anne Archer, Jastrow's production of her own script lines up the arguments that Fonda was a traitor who allowed herself to be filmed on a Vietnamese gun positioned to shoot down American forces. On one level, this is an entire period of American history on trial, in which a young, wealthy and often famous counter-cultural elite flirted with a radical chic that came back on them and sometimes bit them hard. As Fonda argues her case, however, Jastrow's at times overly sentimental premise suggests that Fonda might actually have stopped the war.
Whatever the truth of this, and while Archer is no Fonda, the archive footage - of Fonda, of soldiers in the field who committed war crimes, and of the politicians who sent them there - points up an at times fascinating insight into a vital era of late 20th-century history that went beyond the big screen.
Until August 24.
Sirens
Summerhall
Six women step onstage in formal evening gowns and place their manuscripts on a series of lecterns in front of them. The formality of such an opening might suggest a choral recital of politesse and restraint. What follows over the next hour of Belgian company Ontroerend Goed's latest confessional dissection of human behaviour, however, is a provocative litany of self-determination and power, in which all the everyday abuses inflicted on women are thrown back in our faces in a strictly personal fashion.
This is no harangue, however. The performers strike a pose, each first-hand experience delivered with a raging calm.
The keening chorale that accompanies the hardcore porn being projected behind the performers ends up as the wittiest of soundtracks.
In form and delivery, Alexandra Devriendt's production resembles a spikier, less self-congratulatory Vagina Monologues that goes further, the performers looking the audience in the eye as they draw strength from their words.
It's an intimate aesthetic that Devriendt and Ontroerend Goed have applied elsewhere. Here, however, the elegant simplicity of its presentation becomes an unnerving but all too necessary show of strength.
Until August 24
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article