I was uncertain about the idea of a comedy about a British ambassador in an obscure eastern European country.
Would a mix of diplomacy and comedy work? And then I remembered Labour's idea of an ethical foreign policy in the 1990s. That was pretty hilarious, so maybe Ambassadors (BBC Two, Wednesday, 9pm) would work after all.
It certainly has promise. For a start, it is co-written by James Wood, who created Rev, the rather good sitcom with Tom Hollander as a London priest. It also has David Mitchell and Robert Webb in it: Mitchell as the British ambassador to the fictional Central Asian Republic of Tazbekistan and Webb as his second-in-command.
In reality, they are playing exactly the same characters as the ones they played in their Channel 4 comedy Peep Show. Mitchell is the bumbly, ineffectual, socially retarded one and Webb is the slightly sleazy, swaggery one who is also socially retarded but doesn't know it. In Mitchell's case, this means that Britain's representatives abroad are stereotyped as well-meaning but accident prone. This may or may not be true.
It wasn't the only racial stereotyping going on. In fact, the first episode was full of many broad generalisations about foreigners. Eastern Europeans need a bribe to get things done, for example, and the French will come out kicking, biting and eye gouging to get their own way.
What just about prevented this from being offensive was the fact that most of the racial stereotyping was aimed at the British characters. Particularly amusing was Matthew Macfadyen, a wonderful, changeable, attractive actor who is now inheriting all the roles that Hugh Grant used to be good at. In Ambassadors, he played a slick, slicked-down, supremely confident Tory minister who wants to secure a £2 billion helicopter deal with the Tazbeks pretty much at all costs.
Which was where Ambassadors looked like it might make some interesting points about British foreign policy, but then it didn't. A programme like The Thick Of It or Yes Minister would slap or punch home its point, but Ambassadors has a coquettish, shy approach to saying anything satirical or revealing about its central subject.
Webb's character, Deputy Head of Mission Neil Tilly, was being bribed, and there was talk about avoiding a Blair/Gaddafi-style handshake with the local politicians, and getting the balance right between being close to and distant from questionable foreign contacts at the same time. But it lacked conviction. Just when it began to circle its point, it veered off again.
This, combined with the lack of any interesting plot, meant the first episode went flabby and flat, like one of the less successful cakes on last week's Bake Off final. Mitchell and Webb are always watchable, which helps, but we were watching them doing something vaguely like the thing they did before. There is probably a place for a satire on Britain's role abroad but it needs to be fierce and brave and risky. Like one of the more successful cakes on Bake Off, Ambassadors was much too homely and nice and warm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article