The man railing against the curfew that's preventing the music running beyond 11 o'clock is 71.
Over to his left is another chap, three years older, who has just sung his heart out, berating his lover, Jane, for fooling with him. So a large raspberry for those who reckon that rock 'n' roll is a young person's game.
The men in question, Paul Kantner, founder of Jefferson Starship, née Airplane, and David Frieberg, a California rock veteran whose CV includes 1960s west coast heroes Quicksilver Messenger Service as well as the now-40-year-old Baron Von Tollbooth and the Chrome Nun album with various Starship alumni, are the names who front a band whose music manages to sound both of a charming vintage and indecently current.
Their hits, including White Rabbit, Somebody to Love and the later Count on Me, roll back the years but in this guise they have the power to excite all over again.
Instrumentally the band is in great shape, sounding supertight despite it being only drummer Richard Newman's second gig and presenting both near-stadium rock heroics without the pomp or excess and intimate moments. Vocally, though, it's beyond great, in large part thanks to the phenomenal Cathy Richardson, whose exhilaratingly volcanic rock chick with genuine soul soaring lends extraordinary presence alongside the admittedly now rather gnarly Kantner and the still totally convincing Frieberg.
Richardson's own passionate If I Could was a particular highlight, as was a brilliantly revitalised Fast Buck Freddie, and if Wooden Ships, a Kantner co-write with David Crosby, didn't have Crosby Stills & Nash's sweet precision, Richardson's conviction made it heart-swellingly memorable.
HHHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article