Past Booker longlistee and New York Times notable book choice Paul Pickering isn't the kind of author to research via the internet.
For his latest novel, set in Afghanistan, he spent time on such dangerous terrain that he was moved to thank "my donkey man and my donkey, for being very cheerful and steady under fire". When Stef Penney won the Costa award for The Tenderness Of Wolves, many believed she had spent time in the wilds of Canada, so convincing was her portrayal. But she had never visited the country. Can real-life experience supercede home-based research? The final chapters of this novel strongly suggest it does.
Pickering's young American protagonist, Malone, is a pilot with an aid airline in Kabul on the eve of the 2009 elections. He has been enlisted by the wealthy daughter of a Pakistani former government agent, Fatima Hamza, to help with her vanity project, a personal retelling of The Wizard Of Oz, which is her father's favourite film.
Meanwhile, Malone's practising-Christian surgeon wife Kim is trying to get pregnant with no success. Their marriage is disintegrating, so they're both happy to accept commissions elsewhere – Kim goes to Kandahar to help with a Red Cross emergency, and Malone to Bamiyan. His mission is two-fold: a video of Fatima's Wizard Of Oz has been leaked to YouTube and fundamentalists are calling for her blood. A young girl is mistakenly killed and her family vow revenge on her. But Fatima also wants to retrace her father's roots.
Perhaps the Beckett quote Pickering uses at the beginning of his novel should warn of the outcome. Indeed, narrative tension is undercut further by the relentless violence around all the characters which makes staying alive a miraculous event – Kim's partner is beheaded on the way to Kandahar and she is taken prisoner; Malone and Fatima embark on a Last Of The Mohicans-style chase through the mountainous terrain of the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, constantly under fire from both the Taliban and the American and British forces.
There's no doubt that Pickering's experiences in Afghanistan have helped immeasurably when describing the detail of Malone and Fatima's journey. But it has also given him an insight to the country's people. His admiration and sympathy for an embattled but proud people is clear. Even when Kim is released, after saving the life of a Taliban commander, she is still in danger – the same commander has ordered that she be placed in front of any firing line when the occupation forces attack. But an older fighter removes her from risk, saying that he has daughters, unlike the young commander.
This is a highly sympathetic viewpoint, designed to remind readers that, under the bombs and the terrorism are simply ordinary people like anyone else, cast into extraordinary situations. No-one is tortured or raped or beaten when they are captured in Pickering's Afghanistan; indeed, Kim even has a night of passion with one of her captors, an event that seemed just too romantic to be true, and too far from Kim's devout Christian upbringing. Part of the problem with this incident is that we see too little of Kim's story and character to make it convincing. Most of Pickering's focus is on the central relationship between Malone and Fatima, a game of cat and mouse, where the alluring Fatima seems always to be promising something more, leading the ever-willing Malone into further danger.
If Malone seems a little out of his depth, a brave and stoical individual who nevertheless has shied away from adventure until now, Fatima is his reckless counterpoint, seemingly oblivious to the dangers around her. There's a good reason for that recklessness, and Pickering's closing chapters are among the best, and most moving, of the novel. It is here that his experience really comes into its own.
Over The Rainbow
Paul Pickering
Simon and Schuster, £16.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article