The Locked Ward, the memoirs of a psychiatric orderly working in a Scottish hospital, might have been one kind of book, but ends up being another.
It might have been the kind of book that tried to tell us where we're going wrong in our treatment of patients with mental health problems; it might have prescribed a solution.
It might also – because the author Dennis O'Donnell is a student of English literature – have been the kind of book that tried to put right what novels have done to our view of insanity. It might have tried to banish the image of the first Mrs Rochester starting fires in Jane Eyre, or Renfield biting down on an insect in Dracula, or Patrick McMurphy staring into space after his lobotomy in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest. Those images are old ones. But they stick.
However, The Locked Ward ends up being none of those books – it doesn't analyse or proselytise; it just relates what happens in a ward in vivid, bloody, scatological detail. It is not a solution or an answer; it is a despatch, a factual account, a news report from a zone we rarely hear from.
In the middle of that zone are patients like Johnny. O'Donnell remembers how Johnny would pace up and down the ward then suddenly stop and ask if he was on the right road for the bus stop. Later O'Donnell would find him slumped in a chair, cap and jacket still on, sound asleep. "And my throat would close a little," says O'Donnell. "He reminded me of my grandfather."
The most moving section of the book, however, is when O'Donnell describes the effects of mental ill health and, in particular, dementia; he talks about the pinboards at the patients' bedsides covered in pictures of friends and relatives. Those pictures were, he says, like stills from movies but movies nobody could remember.
Equally moving is the section where O'Donnell describes what dementia does: "The days get pared away from the memory, and then the months and the years, but from the wrong direction. It happens backwards. Finally, the memory is erased - Each day was their first day. And they would never escape, never get better."
If there is a fatalistic tone to this description, it's because there is a fatalistic tone to the book. O'Donnell describes what conditions are like in a locked ward – long stretches of boredom with flashes of violence – and seems to accept it will always be so.
He also appears to take a similar approach to the subject of whether some wards should be locked in the first place. He acknowledges how awful it can be to be contained and quotes Blake: "A robin red breast in a cage/ Puts all Heaven in a rage." He also admits that, in many cases, locking a patient up increases the likelihood of aggression. If this is just a prison under another name, then it will have the same effects as a prison – the inmates will become depersonalised, stigmatised, resentful, mutinous, violent. And yet, in the end, O'Donnell seems fatalistic about all of this too: some wards must be locked because there will always be some patients who need to be locked up.
What does feel odd though is that O'Donnell does not go further and give us more of his views on the treatments he witnessed and sometimes imposed. For long stretches of the book, it feels frustrating that the patients come in, tell their stories and then go out again, and we get no sense of how they get on, or if they are cured or helped. Until you realise O'Donnell is only reflecting what it was really like in the hospital: patients do disappear and the staff often don't know what happens to them.
And that's when O'Donnell does, finally, attempt to refute those old novels with their garish, ghoulish representations of mental health. In a real ward, he says, there are no fictional narratives, no cinematic happy endings, just life as it is.
The Locked Ward
Dennis O'Donnell
Jonathan Cape, £16.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article