The first thing to be said about The Iron Lady is that Meryl Streep is remarkable as Margaret Thatcher.
As accustomed as we are to Streep's chameleon-like skills, she surpasses herself as the former British prime minister, her performance combining uncanny mimicry with emotional depth. It's a shockingly good piece of acting.
However, the film itself is another matter. Entertaining but limited, it is founded on a decision – to take the politics out of a study of one of the world's most controversial political leaders – which is at once bold and bloody absurd. For anyone who experienced the Thatcher years, it feels quite insulting.
Writer Abi Morgan and director Phyllida Lloyd seem keen to provide a very particular biopic, not exactly feminist, but focused on the experience of a woman's struggle to succeed in a man's world, and the personal cost of her single-minded career on her family life. Moreover, it is told through Thatcher's own, imagined perspective, her memories in old age and with the onset of dementia, during which time she also converses with her long-dead husband Denis (Jim Broadbent), the rock throughout most of her career.
Thus we're offered the view of the young Margaret (Alexandra Roach), the grocer's daughter inspired to enter politics by her father's belief in self-reliance and hard work, but confronted in parliament by chauvinism and class snobbery; her comical (although highly effective) attempt to transform her public persona, in her bid for the Tory leadership, and, in the present, the doting attention of her daughter Carol, lent poignancy by Margaret's absenteeism as a mother.
This approach, aided by Streep's warm-blooded performance, results in a portrait that is deliberately sympathetic, rather than analytical. It can't be a coincidence that the film leaps over the period between Thatcher entering parliament in 1959 and her position as education secretary in Edward Heath's floundering government 11 years later – a period that would have consolidated her economic thinking and a certain loss of innocence.
Likewise, while namechecking the major events of Thatcher's premiership – the miners' strike, the Brighton bombing, the Falklands, the poll tax riots – there is little insight into what turned an idealist into a tyrant, and no reflection whatsoever on Thatcher's legacy. And a great opportunity becomes a damp squib. David Cameron who, like Thatcher, seems determined to make the working classes and most vulnerable pay the greatest cost of recession, must be breathing a huge sigh of relief.
I'm pretty sure that the aim of Mother And Child is to celebrate the power of the maternal instinct and the bond between parent and child, but, if that's the case, writer/director Rodrigo Garcia has a strange way of going about it.
This singularly grey yarn concerns a woman (Annette Bening) turned into a harridan by her decision to give up her daughter for adoption, while the girl herself (Naomi Watts) has been so scarred by the abandonment that she's grown into a cold, manipulative loner. Another woman (Kerry Washington) is driven half-mad by her obsessive pursuit to adopt, her self-worth crushed by her inability to have a child of her own.
Although the performances, particularly that of an admirably chilly Watts, hold one's attention, this is too depressing by half, so much so that the contrived happy ending leaves one not only unmoved, but appalled.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article