University Challenge: St Andrews v Cardiff
BBC2/iPlayer
Glasgow no more. Strathclyde no more. Aberdeen no more. Dundee no more. Or not in the new series of University Challenge, anyway. Out of 19 universities in Scotland, only two, St Andrews and Edinburgh, are in this year’s competition.
Scottish contestants punch above their weight on Mastermind, with two Glaswegian winners in recent years, but University Challenge is proving a quiz contest too far for home teams. Questions should be asked in the Scottish Parliament.
It’s a pity, because the St Andrews v Cardiff battle turned out to be one of the most thrilling of the series so far.
St Andrews, founded 1413, last won the competition in 1982. Hoping to do better this year were: Diane Buffet-Mogel, from Princeton, New Jersey, studying classics and philosophy; George Capell, Broughton Hackett, Worcestershire, economics; Freddy Skerrett, captain, London, history; and Tom Rosas, Richmond, physics.
Representing Cardiff, which traces its roots to the 19th century, were: Kyle Gilbert, from Worcester, reading history; Rosalie Tarsala, Arcadia, California, studying for a masters in data science; Conor Boyling, captain, Dartford, history and economics; and Henrik Holm, Manchester, studying physics.
St Andrews were first on the scoreboard with a correct answer from Buffet-Mogel on The Count of Monte Cristo.
Tarsala interrupted St Andrews’ run, putting 20 points on the clock for Cardiff with an answer on Indian cinema. Both sides were having trouble with the bonus questions until Cardiff’s Holm had a clean sweep on the subject of catastrophes.
Cardiff was now ahead 80 to 40. Team captain Boyling, whose hair matched that of UK Transport Secretary Louise Haigh, picked up a starter on letters of the Greek alphabet, and it was St Andrews 40, Cardiff 100.
Buffet-Mogel began the St Andrews fightback, with the team adding 20 points from questions about epistemology and one-act plays.
But then disaster struck St Andrews. A storm swept in from across the Atlantic and its name was soul music.
Both teams had failed to identify Green Onions by Booker T. & The M.G.s.
Read more
- Is it the last dance for Strictly?
- Post Office drama shows TV can move mountains
Skerrett bounced back with an answer on the card game Mahjong, but this was followed by three bonus questions on Stax Records, the legendary record company based in Memphis, Tennessee. After a blast of each track, St Andrews had to name the artists.
The first song was with Hold On, I’m Comin, by Sam & Dave. St Andrews thought it was Ike and Tina Turner. Quiz host Amol Rajan raised an eyebrow.
Next was Wilson Pickett, The Midnight Hour. St Andrews opted for “Marvin Gaye”. Rajan looked like he’d been punched in the face.
Final question, and a chance for St Andrews to redeem themselves. The unmistakable voice of Otis Redding glided across the studio. Unmistakable, that is, unless you were St Andrews.
The mics picked up the students' conversation.
“Oh, that’s erm, the blind guy.”
“Stevie Wonder?”
“No.”
“Ray Charles.”
They went with Ray Charles. The camera cut to a despairing Rajan putting his head on the desk. “What are you guys listening to? My goodness,” he said.
Would this shameful ignorance of popular music be fatal for the third oldest university in the English-speaking world, the alma mater of William, Kate, and The Herald’s esteemed health correspondent Helen McCardle?
St Andrews rallied, bringing the score to 150 each with just minutes to go.
Capell (St Andrews) swooped on a question about invasive plant species but the answer was wrong, costing his team five points. The east coast team never recovered, with Cardiff pulling ahead for a final score of 200 to St Andrews’ 145.
Next week: Edinburgh take on Leeds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel