Theatre
Snake in the Grass
Dundee Rep
Four stars
Ghosts are very much in the house in Alan Ayckbourn’s 2002 play. The garden too for that matter. And the tennis court. Not to mention what might be lurking at the bottom of the well. This is something the two middle-aged sisters at the play’s centre must square up to when they are reunited in their childhood home following their father’s death.
High-flying Abigail is making a prodigal’s return after years of collapsed businesses and broken relationships while living abroad. This left her sister Miriam to tend to their now dearly departed dad while putting her own life on hold. Or so it seems. Only the old boy’s nurse Alice knows the full story, and she wants a cool hundred grand to keep it to herself.
What follows is a series of double bluffs, things that go bump in the night and daddy issues galore as what looks suspiciously like a case of accidental murder unfolds alongside a series of increasingly troubling true confessions.
Read more
- Review: Do not watch this if you are scared of flying
- 'I should’ve been dead at 15 months old' - Tributes to actor & writer
In Emily Winter, Deirdre Davis and Ann Louise Ross as Miriam, Annabel and Alice respectively, Andrew Panton’s revival gives three brilliant actresses at their peak the chance to relish the complexities of their characters.
As the cut glass politesse of their exchanges slip into something more venomous, it would be all too easy to ham it up. Winter, Davis and Ross, however, plumb the depths as they expose the damaged goods within on Jen McGinley’s sturdy garden set full of hidden horrors.
Ayckbourn originally wrote his play as an all female companion piece to his all male ghost play, Haunted Julia. Alongside a third piece, Life and Beth, these otherwise stand-alone works made up the Things That Go Bump trilogy.
Despite these female roots, an overriding maleness looms over the action. With the presence of the sisters’ father hanging heavy, Panton’s slickly realised production nevertheless makes for a prime time English horror story with plenty of bite.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here