Theatre
Rebus: A Game Called Malice
Festival Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Three stars
As Ian Rankin’s ever expanding Inspector Rebus universe runs on apace, after twenty-four novels, with a twenty-fifth due any day now, and with the latest TV adaptation by Gregory Burke still fresh, the toughest case to crack for Rankin and his unreconstructed hero so far has been theatre.
Following Rona Munro’s adaptation of a new Rebus story in 2018 with Long Shadows, this latest effort sees Rankin collaborate with playwright Simon Reade on an inspired wheeze that has a whole lot of fun with classic murder mystery fare. In Loveday Ingram’s production originally seen at Cambridge Arts Theatre, Rebus moves upmarket to an Edinburgh New Town dinner party where money talks the loudest, however it was acquired.
Gray O’Brien’s louche Rebus is the unexpected plus one of Abigail Thaw’s lawyer Stephanie Jeffries at a murder mystery night hosted by Teresa Banham’s Harriet and her second husband Paul, played with pukka largesse by Neil McKinven.
Read more
- Tributes to 'Glasgow patriot' who helped found ground-breaking theatre
-
Labour is lost in identity politics as right-wing thrives, says Ben Elton
-
New boss takes over at Scots theatre phenomenon A Play, Pie and a Pint
Also at the table are Billy Hartman’s gambling kingpin Jack Fleming and his influencer girlfriend Candida. She may be glued to her phone, but, as brought to life by Jade Kennedy, Candida isn’t nearly as dumb as some of her posher guests might think.
The first half unravels the complex connections of assorted guests lives in a dense and at times hard to keep up with gossip about old lags, bent coppers and dodgy dealers. Once the inevitable happens, Rankin and Reade put Rebus at the centre of an Agatha Christie styled class war, albeit here with a far smaller body count and some very good one-liners.
As O’Brien occasionally breaks the fourth wall as Rebus to update the audience with the theatrical equivalent of a hardboiled film noir voiceover, it gives our hero another shot onstage in a homage of sorts to an entire history of pulp fiction in all its creaky glory.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here