Extremophile
Ian Green
(Head of Zeus, £20)
Aberdeen’s Ian Green is the author of a fantasy trilogy and the holder of a PhD in Epigenetics, the study of how environmental influences can turn genes on and off without altering their DNA sequence.
This means we can expect him to excel in at least two things: world-building and convincing tech-speak, both of which are central to Extremophile, a pre-apocalyptic thriller that hinges on alterations to the human genome.
Anyone acquainted with cyberpunk (which is, by now, basically everyone) will find the territory reassuringly familiar. Basically, whatever else may have changed by the late 21st Century, punk rockers will apparently still be with us, albeit augmented by wi-fi contact lenses.
Extremophile’s central characters play in an industrial band trying to make their mark on the punk scene with vocals, bass and a vintage Casio keyboard. Charlie (she/her) and lover Parker (they/them) share a dingy flat overlooking marshland some way outside London’s thriving Zone 1. Charlie was once a bioengineer with a good job, but now works freelance, her current project being a service that provides bespoke DNA augments based on clients’ astrological charts – pure hokum, but it pays the bills.
Read more
- Bestselling author who wrote about growing up in Glasgow dies
- Charming tale about an unlikely friendship is ultimate feelgood novel
- Iain Banks' Wasp Factory is 40. How did that happen?
Outside, the world is in climatic and political freefall. Corporations rule the roost, backed up by the police. People are divided into Greens (militant eco-warriors doing what they can to save a choking Earth), Blues (corporate types) and Blacks (those who have no hope for the future and live accordingly).
The Blues are naturally the villains of the piece, embodied by John Birchley, an amoral corporate bioengineer who receives commissions in red envelopes from someone known only as the Postman. His latest request is from a Mexican cartel that wants him to punish an embezzling accountant by transplanting his brain into a pig. Although their politics and ethics are light-years apart, John and Charlie are probably more alike than they would want to admit. It’s not just about money: they both like the challenge of doing “the weird shit”.
Charlie and her crew are enlisted by a group of eco-warriors to carry out a heist, which involves killing a biohacker known as the Ghost and stealing data from corporate servers which, they are assured, will go a long way towards solving the climate crisis and saving the world. By accepting, Charlie will have to face up to the things she did, and the enemies she made, when she worked in the corporate sector herself.
Charlie’s highly technical explanations of genetic manipulation might shoot over most of our heads, but otherwise it’s a straightforward, simply structured thriller, and the central trio of Charlie, Parker and their friend Zoot are actually quite endearing, blessed with a naïve faith that their belief in each other can prevail against a powerful multinational, which inserts a sliver of humanity into a grim dystopian vision.
Green’s confident handling of the underlying science makes the scenario seem believable and frighteningly real. The world he conjures up with such impressive detail and vividness feels intrinsically unstable and constantly shifting.
As the planet teeters on the brink of environmental collapse, this marriage of cybertechnology and genetics has brought forth a society in which people’s identities, on the most fundamental genetic level, are mutable and negotiable, and terrifying new weapons targeted at the DNA of specific individuals are emerging all the time. It’s a queasy prospect.
Even Charlie, who is immersed in this world more fully than most, gets freaked out by it, sometimes wishing she could be back in Scotland, curled up in her mother’s armchair with a comforting cup of tea.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here