Theatre
Hedda Gabler
Botanic Gardens, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
Five stars
The honeymoon is well and truly over by the time we meet the new Mrs Tesman in Kathy McKean’s fresh version of Henrik Ibsen’s seismic drama, which burst on stage in 1891 to mark the beginning of the end of the 19th century in explosive fashion.
McKean’s script is a similarly intense affair, especially confined as it is here in Gordon Barr’s up close and personal Bard in the Botanics production to the ornate surroundings of the Botanic Gardens’ Kibble Palace.
Here, the Palace becomes the aspirational des res the Tesmans now call home, and where Isabelle Joss’ Aunt Julia’ marks her territory by way of her attempt to find a place for everything and put everything in its place. As the roaring boys come calling on the object of their affections they used to know as a bad girl called Hedda Gabler, however, the house’s barely lived in interior will soon be forever marked by tragedy, death and destruction.
Read more
- Françoise Hardy obituary: France's queen of melancholy
- This merry Sense and Sensibility has shades of 1980s small town disco
The latter is instigated by Hedda herself, played here with furious intent by the magnificent Nicole Cooper, who last teamed up with McKean and Barr in 2022 as an equally mighty Medea.
With the boredom simply too much, Cooper’s Hedda strides around her drawing room like a wild animal trying to smash her way out of the domestic cage she has built for herself with Sam Stopford’s nice but dull academic, George Tesman.
As her past comes knocking in the form of her old friend Thea, James Boal’s scheming Judge Brack and Graham Mackay-Bruce’s mercurial Lovburg, Hedda is like a fireball on heat, ping-ponging around at high speed, destroying everything in her path.
She is simply too clever, too funny and too full of lust for life than to stay a writer’s moll the rest of her days. If she is going to go down, she is sure as hell going to take everyone with her, in a devastating study of a woman who calls the shots, but who only has one way out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here