The wealth of information that can be found in the Dictionaries of the Scots Language never ceases to amaze. The above is defined as follows: “A jocular nickname for the Royal Scots Regiment said to have been given circa 1635 during the Thirty Years’ War by French troops to Hepburn’s Regiment, the ancestor of the Royal Scots”.
In his Memoirs of Sir John Hepburn (1851), James Grant described the French connection: “The Régiment de Picardie treated these claims to antiquity with ridicule, as being somewhat overstrained, and gave Hepburn’s corps the sobriquet of Pontius Pilate’s Guard, which the Royal Scots retain at the present day”. Later, in Lowland Scots Regiments (1918), Sir Herbert Maxwell elaborated on this: “The French officers … gave them in derision the nickname of ‘Pontius Pilate’s Bodyguard’, a nickname which sticks to the Royal Scots to this day. It was in one of these disputes that an officer of Hepburn’s made the famous retort that the Picardy regiment must be mistaken, for had the Scots really been Pontius Pilate’s Guard and done duty at the sepulchre, the Holy Body had never left it”.
Despite the slimming down and amalgamation of Scottish regiments, this nickname for the Royal Scots is still remembered, as shown in an article from the Sunday Post (2022): “The Royal Scots were the oldest regiment in the British Army, tracing their history back to 1633, prompting the nickname Pontius Pilate’s Bodyguard while the King’s Own Scottish Borderers were similarly historic - the regiment was formed in 1689”.
Scots Word of the Week comes from Dictionaries of the Scots Language. Visit DSL Online at https://dsl.ac.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here