The Fall and Fall of Derek Haffman
M.J. Nicholls
(Sagging Meniscus, £17.99)
Seventeen years in the making, apparently, and M.J. Nicholls’ fury appears to have diminished not a jot throughout that time. The Fall and Fall of Derek Haffman is an angry, comedic political satire, which starts out at the Scottish Parliament and extends to encompass Britain’s political system, the venality of those who run it and the complacency of those who let them, its imperial past, its class system, the lies it tells about its history and, for good measure, The Cotswolds.
Derek Haffman, 54, is MSP for Linlithgow, and a man so unpopular that a petition among his constituents to have him replaced by a bag of sand has collected 2000 signatures. We find him lolling on a Premier Inn bed with Millie Currigan, an avant-garde rock singer half his age, with whom he is having a sexless affair. Only once Haffman has arrested his descent into “a spiral of vice and sin” will she consider actually sleeping with him.
Haffman has been disillusioned with politics since it became clear to him that someone who had been “elected to peddle hope” could never tell the truth. Bored and cynical, he questions why the liberal left always have to take the high ground. Why can’t they fight dirty too?
He devises a plan “to fight evil with evil and kindness”, roping in some sympathetic Parliamentary colleagues. The first stage is to rifle the wallets of as many MSPs as possible, max out their credit cards and use the money they make to pursue their future plans. Which are? Well, this is where Haffman starts to run aground. By his own admission, “I wanted to make a kind of vague political happening happen. It was sort of incoherent, undefined and non-specific...”
READ MORE
Val McDermid sets record straight on much misunderstood Lady Macbeth
Curious crime writing legend Rankin almost became a suspect himself
Even if he did have solid plans, his attempt to transfer £3 million to an offshore account goes badly wrong, prompting Haffman to run away with Millie to Cadiz, where he’s tracked down by the dreaded Tory grandee Jethro Quiver. It says something about how long this book has been gestating that Jeffrey Archer is the model for Haffman’s nemesis. Still, Quiver serves as the repugnant embodiment of all that is depraved and sociopathic in politics, gleefully inflicting such degrading cruelties on his victims that they can never hope to fully recover.
At once whimsical and savage, Nicholls packs every paragraph with jokes, eccentric turns of phrase, scabrous slanders and bawdy imagery. It’s very noticeable, though, that everyone delivers their lines in the same mannered, ornate way: in long-winded, fluent, grammatical speeches pulling in archaic words, modern slang and freshly-minted neologisms. It’s a full-on style that allows Nicholls to showcase his cleverness and verbal creativity, but it can be exhausting to read.
Readers intrigued by the premise might find their attention drifting as the tight focus on Haffman’s fiendish scheme unfurls into a general condemnation of Britain and its imperial past. Nicholls loves to digress, and while earlier detours (like Haffman’s screed listing every single MSP by name and what he’d like to do to them) are impressive setpieces, by the point Haffman is experiencing a vision of being sucked into a new universe birthed by his hairdresser friend Nellie, the novel feels like it’s getting lost in its own absurdity.
And yet the very density of his prose means that there is no shortage of mischievously funny lines to be found. Its energy seems inexhaustible, and Nicholls’ honest outrage as he charts the futility of Haffman’s one-man rebellion and his subsequent public and private humiliation has cathartic weight.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here